[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Can some explain the difference between Katie Hopkins spouting stuff that is solely designed to get a reaction and make her reality credible and some glamour numpty acting out a showmance or false scenario to gain the same reality recognition.

They are both fake acts designed to gain notoriety so why is she terrible. Speidi did it one way, Davidson did it another way. Both were designed to create public awareness and gain fans. The only difference between people like Speidi, Davidson, Rylan and even Jade, is the way they do it. The end result is always the same, public recognition and a fan base that lines their pockets.

Anyone that believes these people live in the real world are delusional, if they did, nobody would give a toss about them and they would rapidly be forgotten. We all hate a villain, but we love to see them on our screens peddling their wares.

For once I applaud you.

Totes agree.