[kirklancaster]

DAVID CAMERON'S 'EU DEAL' IS AN UTTER FRAUD'

The 'Remain' camp use the 'Deal' as a crutch to support their non-argument;

"It is better to stay in the E.U. and change it from within".

"The E.U. is flawed, but we can only change it for the better if we remain in. Outside the E.U. we won't have any leverage." BUT:

DAVID CAMERON'S 'E.U. RENOGITATION DEAL' IS A WELL PLANNED COMPLEX CON AGAINST THE BRITISH PEOPLE WHICH IS LEGALLY INVALID AND NOT WORTH THE PAPER IT IS WRITTEN UPON.

THE 'DEAL' IS NOT LEGAL

Despite the views to the contrary by a MINORITY of pro-EU lawyers and others who have the same vested interests as Cameron, it is BEYOND DISPUTE that the 'Deal' was NOT made by the EUROPEAN COUNCIL but with the H.S.G's - the HEADS oF state of GOVERNMENTS who are NOT a legal institution of the EU, but a mere intergovernmental forum acting outside the EU treaty framework, and the H.S.G's do NOT have the authority to make treaties.

Although they were meeting WITHIN the European Council, they were NOT not acting AS the European Council.

Even the European Council does NOT have ANY authority to make treaties and because this WAS not an agreement made with ANY EU institution, Cameron's 'Deal' is totally INVALID and incapable of being LEGALLY BINDING under EU law.

The 'Deal' needs to be 'carried' by a vote of 751 MEPs in what is known as the 'co-decision' or 'ordinary legislative procedure' and needs the agreement of the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT as well as the HSG's OFFICIALLY acting AS the EUROPEAN COUNCIL for it to be Legally Binding'.

Even GENUINE treaties are NOT legally binding until they have been ratified - and this IS NO LEGAL TREATY - but HERE, surely ANY intelligent citizen must ask themselves, as to WHY it is that the EU insisted that NO RATIFICATION will take place until AFTER the EU Referendum?

Not only that, but we are not being told just how quickly or even WHEN the 'non-Treaty' is being ratified - 2016? 2020? - How about NEVER once the UK has voted to remain and it is all too late, because THERE IS NO 'DEAL' TO RATIFY.

JUST LOOK AT WHAT THE EU 'BIGWIGS' THEMSELVES HAVE ADMITTED ABOUT CAMERON'S 'DEAL':

MARTIN SCHULTZ - THE PRESIDENT of THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT:

.
"David Cameron’s package of EU reforms cannot be made legally binding before the British public vote on it, and The European Parliament COULD AMEND ANY DEAL done at today’s summit and WOULD NOT NECESSARILY EVEN RUBBER STAMP IT AT ALL".

“NO GOVERNMENT can go to a parliament and ASK FOR A GUARANTEE ABOUT THE RESULT".
*
This threat is both a revelation and a far cry from Cameron's assurance that his deal was 'legally binding' but it is Schultz's unambiguous WARNING to us Brits which should ram home what I am saying, because he WARNED US THAT; "THERE WOULD BE NO TREATY CHANGE AS A RESULT OF THIS DEAL".

ALEXANDER GRAF LAMBSDORFF - THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
‘Cameron’s deal is NOT binding. At the moment, the whole thing is nothing more than a deal that has been hammered out down the local bazaar. The European Union, however, is a community of law, in which there are regulated responsibilities. If the British are going to put all their eggs in one basket, in a promise made like this, which has not yet complied with our clean process of law, then, for me, this process of law is more important and preferable.’

If this does not convince that you are all being scammed, let us see what other EU noteables have had to say:

FRANCOIS HOLLANDE - PRESIDENT OF FRANCE
"The 'Deal' is NOT binding. There were NO deviation from the European rules” and “NO exception to the rules of the single market”.

Hollande is adamant that Cameron's (non) concessions do not even require changes to existing EU treaties, but could be included in them “WHEN THERE IS A TREATY REVISION PROCEDURE ONE DAY, BUT THERE ARE NO REVISION OF THE TREATIES PLANNED".

ANDREW DUFF - PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN FEDERALISTS
(And a former Member of the European Parliament for the East of England region of the UK) - [/U]
"As the personnel at the summit changes, which they do fairly frequently, the deal will become less authoritative, and may be amended, reversed or ignored.’"

[U]DOMINIQUE RIQUET - GROUP OF THE ALLIANCE OF LIBERALS AND DEMOCRATS FOR EUROPE & M.E.P.[/U]

Riquet and his colleagues are HOPING for a Brexit because: "Britain is a problematic member that blocks more rapid integration and political unification"

His friend, the Vice President of The European Union, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, had this to say of Riquet's comments:

"The UK is an incredibly laborious member state. In this respect I do understand where Riquet and others that want progress in European integration are coming from and I know that the UK has sometimes blocked progress in that regard.’

Now, if Riquet and Lambsdorff and their EU cronies ALREADY view the UK as trouble causers and a hindrance to the rest of the EU - in other words, the rest of the EU is opposed to the AIMS of the UK within the EU - BEFORE THE CHANGES IN CAMERON'S SUPPOSED 'DEAL', then it is PATENTLY obvious that even IF Cameron's 'deal' WAS genuine, that these MEP's WILL VETO EVERYTHING IN IT.

That 'IF' is redundant though, because THERE IS NO DEAL TO RATIFY or for the other Member States to veto any of the terms contained therein.

"The current Heads of State or Government cannot guarantee the passage of treaty amendments that this deal proposes to be implemented in an unspecified time in the future.

Even if the Heads of Government could guarantee the passage of the proposed amendments, they could not guarantee their ratification. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties Article 61 states:

"A party may invoke the impossibility of performing a treaty as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from it if the impossibility results from the permanent disappearance or destruction of an object indispensable for the execution of the treaty."

There is no proposal to ratify a treaty before the referendum, in-fact it is not clear when treaty revision will occur, it will likely be years away. We will then be dealing with different Heads of Government and State, and a different European Council, they will be under no obligation to honour the agreement struck by their predecessors.

YOU ARE BEING CONNED