[user104658]

Originally Posted by Nutcracker Sweet

The reason I asked you that marsh is when those two 10 year olds killed James Bulger,there were some that said they didn't know what they were doing they were only 10,do you believe that train of thought? as it was said they had got ideas from the movie Chucky,so were they influenced or not ? and were they old enough to understand,I have my own views but would like yours. By the way no one likes gaming more than me,especially the Tombraider games,but even I have been known to throw the control and call her a stupid cow,LOL,so they do get in your head.

I know you're asking Marsh but my opinion on this is that it's utter BS that they didn't know what they were doing was wrong. I know that I have a just turned 8 year old who doesn't care at all about violence on screen but would never dream of hurting another child - much less a child younger than her - and I'm fairly confident that all of her friends the same age are exact the same. Of course they know the difference and the idea that they did it because of watching "Chucky" is just as ridiculous as the notion that a violent game can be the cause of a child or teenager turning to real violence. When it comes to Mrs right down to the very basics of that case... From what I've read I believe that Thompson quite probably had (has) some sort of psychopathy or at least extreme sociopathy and that was essentially what lead to that horrific crime. Most people seem to think of Venables as the ringleader but if you look into their behaviour immediately after the crime and accounts of how they were in the years afterwards, I highly doubt that is the case.

But yes, anyway, no it wasn't a film that caused them to do what they did, it all scapegoating, the same as with gaming. Healthy, well adjusted people know the difference, know it early (I would say aged 5 or 6, max) and can't be turned to violence by stories and games.