[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by Adam.

If ypou don't want to get pregnant use protection

Thanks for that insight Adam

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Thanks for that insight Adam

Well it is a lot of people get abortions because of drunken 1 night stands or accidents.

I believe Abortions should only be for medical reasons or if the child is servilely disabled and will have no quality of life

[bots]

Originally Posted by Adam.

Well it is a lot of people get abortions because of drunken 1 night stands or accidents.

I believe Abortions should only be for medical reasons or if the child is servilely disabled and will have no quality of life

that doesn't affect the fundamental right to have an abortion though. That is an issue of irresponsible behaviour which is an entirely different thing.

[Cherry Christmas]

Youtube video

This looks more than a cluster of cells to me

[Denver]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

that doesn't affect the fundamental right to have an abortion though. That is an issue of irresponsible behaviour which is an entirely different thing.

They should allow the father to decide

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Adam.

I believe Abortions should only be for medical reasons or if the child is servilely disabled and will have no quality of life

This is kind of an example of what I said earlier in the thread about how people against abortion seem to care more about restricting the choice than what comes after the pregnancy.

Some people aren't fit to be parents or they aren't currently in the right place to be parents, why force them into having children when they aren't ready? Why force them through that process just so the kid can be raised in a struggling or unhealthy environment or raised within the system if the parents give them up?

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Some people aren't fit to be parents or they aren't currently in the right place to be parents, why force them into having children when they aren't ready? Why force them through that process just so the kid can be raised in a struggling or unhealthy environment or raised within the system if the parents give them up?

That's why it's lucky that adoption is a thing.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

That's why it's lucky that adoption is a thing.

Why should a woman who didn't want to be pregnant in the first place be forced to go through 9 months of trials and tribulations just to give a baby up into the system?

Again, another example of people caring more about forcing the pregnancy to full term than the child that follows it.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

That's why it's lucky that adoption is a thing.

Giving birth is not only traumatic and very painful - there is always a risk attached, however minimal. Who then takes responsibility if a woman dies after being forced to give birth - that would be murder in my opinion - and is just one element of this.

Her rights over her own body do and should have priority over the feelings/opinions of a man who does not approve of abortion.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

This is kind of an example of what I said earlier in the thread about how people against abortion seem to care more about restricting the choice than what comes after the pregnancy.

Some people aren't fit to be parents or they aren't currently in the right place to be parents, why force them into having children when they aren't ready? Why force them through that process just so the kid can be raised in a struggling or unhealthy environment or raised within the system if the parents give them up?

If she doesn't want a child she should take protective precautions

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Adam.

If she doesn't want a child she should take protective precautions

That's an ignorant statement. No contraception is 100% perfect, what are you going to say next? Only have sex to procreate? How far down the rabbit hole are you prepared to go to deny women their right to choose what to do with their own bodies?