[Ammi]

...I think it’s creepy to want to photograph anyone, child/adult in the privacy of their home...unless specifically invited to...

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I think it’s creepy to want to photograph anyone, child/adult in their privacy of their home...unless specifically invited to...

And also illegal in California but LT thinks these perps should get away with it because .................Meghan Markle

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

And also illegal in California but LT thinks these perps should get away with it because .................Meghan Markle

...if only Diana had taken more legal action over the invasions of privacy taken by the paparazzi, maybe she would still be alive...

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I think it’s creepy to want to photograph anyone, child/adult in the privacy of their home...unless specifically invited to...

But they are not just 'anyone' are they? Why would the press want a picture of joe bloggs in his garden

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Ammi

...I think it’s creepy to want to photograph anyone, child/adult in the privacy of their home...unless specifically invited to...

It’s wrong to be photographing children in their own homes but please stop with the creepy line of defence.

The press get paid to get exclusive pictures, the one’s that are worth the most are the ones people don’t want the public to see.