| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#26 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#28 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
he could equally think no one is good enough for his Princess
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#29 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
It plays into the trope that all mother-in-laws are middle-aged battleaxes who you would obviously want to avoid. Of course it's misogynistic. It could probably be argued that it's very "low level" misogyny but
the subtle messages are the ones that let the larger ones flourish.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#30 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#32 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#33 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...it could have been ‘father in law’ just easily, but it wasn’t...because there hasn’t really been father in law ‘humour’ in the same way...as in, inferring father in laws are bit monstrous and stereotyping them in such a negative way...it’s not providing any ‘equal, why ‘in law humour at all’...and it’s definitely not progressing in any way by using a ‘humour’ that has become out dated for a reason...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#34 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
they should have used "Chugger" instead as that would put the fear of God in most
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#36 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...I mean, one of the very things that ‘father in law humour’ hasn’t been a thing is what should have told them that this was an awful regression...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#37 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...it’s stereotyping a ‘role’ as it were, in a negative way because it’s equating it to an horrendous virus...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#38 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
Where did you get the impression that targetting the entire gender is a prerequisite of something being misogyny? One of the targetted characteristics of the joke is that it is the female in-law, specifically, thus it's gender-targetted, thus it's misogynistic. Just because it only applies to "mother in laws" and not women in general doesn't make it not misogyny. That's like the claim that Tommy Robinson isn't racist because he has black mates and only says bad things about Muslims. Or saying that someone "isn't homophobic" because they only dislike effeminate gay men and are fine with the blokey ones.
Last edited by user104658; 08-09-2020 at 09:12 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#39 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
![]() to say everyone hates them is just ridiculous
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
Last edited by Cherie; 08-09-2020 at 09:13 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#40 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
But not all women are mothers.
![]() And not all mothers are monstrous in-laws. Last edited by Marsh.; 08-09-2020 at 09:16 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#41 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
....some day you might be a Marsh in-law...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#42 | |||
|
||||
|
Hands off my Brick!
|
Quote:
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#44 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
I can see how some mother-in-law humour can be seen as sexist.
But this is literally "avoid people like you might avoid your mother-in-law". The number of people who actually do that is quite high.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#45 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#46 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...yeah, we can socially distance and put our masks on of we see you in the distance...
...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#47 | ||
|
|||
|
-
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#48 | |||
|
||||
|
Hands off my Brick!
|
Quote:
![]() If all mother-in-laws are women and some women are monstrous, which of these statements are true? A - All Mother-in-Laws are monstrous B - Some Mother-in-Laws are monstrous C - No Monsters are mothers
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#49 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...so there are many who seem to not like those old immigrants...We could treat coronavirus like those asylum seekers, yeah...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#50 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Quote:
...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|