[Niamh.]

The woman would later acquire notoriety for appearing to defend male terrorists' use of minority group Yazidis as sex slaves.

Gross.

Sent from my SM-G780G using Tapatalk

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

The woman would later acquire notoriety for appearing to defend male terrorists' use of minority group Yazidis as sex slaves.

Gross.

Sent from my SM-G780G using Tapatalk

Ikr. But who cares about that when she said she wouldn't drink out of a mug used by someone else?

[Ammi]

The woman would later acquire notoriety for appearing to defend male terrorists' use of minority group Yazidis as sex slaves.


…so presumably ‘the woman’ is Shamima Begum, the radicalised Isis bride, then…?…

…in 2014 she made these worrying tweets and was active in communication with someone who had been infamously radicalised and had gone to Syria in 2015…but in 2016 she was able to join the police force without any depth of background research…not even two years of any easily found social media history looked at…that in itself is surely hugely answerable for and deeply concerning…imagine if DBS searches etc for working with children were as surface and lacking in depth as that…an entire police force and only two years of social media to look back on to employ people of such weighty positions…I’m not quite understanding this at all, this seems very layered …maybe the checks were done and these tweets were known when the position was given…?….

[bots]

It's just not appropriate for the police to have that type of person in their employ

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

It's just not appropriate for the police to have that type of person in their employ

….but we’re being more or less told that ‘appropriate’ isn’t/wasn’t looked into in even the most surface of ways by an establishment who has so many sources available to them…and which the DM have ‘searched’ so easily, which is hugely worrying, I feel…if she was deemed ‘not appropriate’ then the police force are answerable …because even if they deemed ‘a dismissal’ appropriate now….the whole employment system has to surely be looked at of others within the police force…

[Ammi]

….diversity isn’t the issue, an absence of basic history searches …(…according to the article…)…is the huge concern and the issue if this person is now deemed unsuitable for a job that she was employed to do in 2016 …because any of her words/beliefs/prejudices etc were in quite open text prior to that employment beginning…

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Ammi

….diversity isn’t the issue, an absence of basic history searches …(…according to the article…)…is the huge concern and the issue if this person is now deemed unsuitable for a job that she was employed to do in 2016 …because any of her words/beliefs/prejudices etc were in quite open text prior to that employment beginning…

Its not just diversity, they obviously have targets set for older/younger/female as well as diverse officers as why else would Wayne Couzens have got through, or that guy who has far right links, they are too busy filling quotas rather than doing proper background checks, so much for a DBS