[bots]

Originally Posted by parmnion

At russia...fire them at russia.

and you dont think russia would nuke us in response?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Strike first....from afar..first, and heavily..

It will shut putin down.

The way M.A.D works is that it's impossible to wipe out nuke-firing capability with a first strike, thus ensuring that there can be no winner. It's literally the entire point of Trident; the UK could be wiped off the face of the planet entirely, and we'd still have enough nuclear firepower at sea to destroy whoever did it.

Russia doesn't need a programme like Trident because it's ****ing massive and has active nuclear silos scattered all over the place. Impossible to target them all without there still being plenty left to fire back.

[arista]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It's not tough for me....tough for the ukranians though....one in all in, that's my motto

No, they are not in NATO,

[Beso]

It's just hard to sit idly by as innocent mothers and children are targeted, and about to be targeted with chemicals.

We cant just do nothing if he uses them..or can we?

If we can, I dont think I want to be british anymore

[arista]

Originally Posted by parmnion

It's just hard to sit idly by as innocent mothers and children are targeted, and about to be targeted with chemicals.

We cant just do nothing if he uses them..or can we?

If we can, I dont think I want to be british anymore

We are Supplying them with weapons.


As they are not in NATO,
that and Sanctions on Russia
is all they get

We are British
not fighting Russia


President Biden arrives on Thursday.
He will deal with it.

[Beso]

If we are supplying the weapons..what does it matter who's finger is pressing the trigger..

[bots]

The UK has provided Ukrainian forces with more than 4,000 anti-tank missile systems to help with "their resistance against Russian aggression", the Ministry of Defence says.

In a series of tweets, the ministry says the devices sent were NLAWs (Next Generation Light Anti-tank Weapons).

The ministry also refers to a video it describes as "Russian propaganda". It appears to be referring to footage published by two prominent Russian hoaxers who asked UK Defence Secretary Ben Wallace about an alleged nuclear weapons programme for Ukraine, and who appeared to suggest the UK was running low on anti-tank weapons.

In the tweets, the MoD says the UK has "enough weapons systems to defend both UK national security and maintain our commitments to Nato".

"People should be very sceptical about reporting on, and accepting as real, any part of these Russian state doctored clips," it adds.

[arista]

Originally Posted by parmnion

If we are supplying the weapons..what does it matter who's finger is pressing the trigger..

It matters to the Evil Russian Troops
and Evil Putin.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by arista

It matters to the Evil Russian Troops
and Evil Putin.

Wouldn't surprise me if the ground troops were predominantly football hooligans.

The videos ive seen just show an inept bunch of soldiers who dont even know how not to point your weapon at a fellow soldier whilst dismounting a vehicle whilst under attack.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Wouldn't surprise me if the ground troops were predominantly football hooligans.

The videos ive seen just show an inept bunch of soldiers who dont even know how not to point your weapon at a fellow soldier whilst dismounting a vehicle whilst under attack.

Many are conscripts who wont have had any training

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

The UK has provided Ukrainian forces with more than 4,000 anti-tank missile systems to help with "their resistance against Russian aggression", the Ministry of Defence says.

In a series of tweets, the ministry says the devices sent were NLAWs (Next Generation Light Anti-tank Weapons).

The ministry also refers to a video it describes as "Russian propaganda". It appears to be referring to footage published by two prominent Russian hoaxers who asked UK Defence Secretary Ben Wallace about an alleged nuclear weapons programme for Ukraine, and who appeared to suggest the UK was running low on anti-tank weapons.

In the tweets, the MoD says the UK has "enough weapons systems to defend both UK national security and maintain our commitments to Nato".

"People should be very sceptical about reporting on, and accepting as real, any part of these Russian state doctored clips," it adds.

Will we get those anti tank missile systems back ?!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Will we get those anti tank missile systems back ?!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

nope

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Will we get those anti tank missile systems back ?!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

We will have to kidnap a 60 yr old Zelensky for that debt to be paid back to the taxpayer.

[arista]

Originally Posted by parmnion

We will have to kidnap a 60 yr old Zelensky for that debt to be paid back to the taxpayer.

No, most of The world like him.

As a New Leader, he has done well.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by arista

No, most of The world like him.

As a New Leader, he has done well.

**** comedian though

[arista]

Originally Posted by parmnion

**** comedian though

Yes he was
and the work he did before,
has helped him in this new role

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

nope

That will cost us Łmillions !!!

Yet some of their influential people are criticising us for not helping out !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by Zizu

That will cost us Łmillions !!!

Yet some of their influential people are criticising us for not helping out !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Some Ukrainians? Generally they've been incredibly appreciative of our support

[Beso]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

and you dont think russia would nuke us in response?

He wouldnt get backing to use nukes from china or North Korea.

[bots]

Originally Posted by parmnion

He wouldnt get backing to use nukes from china or North Korea.

he doesn't need their backing

[bots]

Originally Posted by Zizu

That will cost us Łmillions !!!

Yet some of their influential people are criticising us for not helping out !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

we have given them 800 million of support so far, but lets put this in context, ukraine are basically fighting for democracy in europe

[Beso]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

he doesn't need their backing

He would ask first though, then re consider afterwards.

[bots]

Originally Posted by parmnion

He would ask first though, then re consider afterwards.

russia wouldnt ask anyone before nuking someone, china wouldnt ask russia and neither would north korea

For that matter, we wouldn't ask anyone either if someone had nuked us, no country would

Putin has made up an entire fake narrative to go to war with ukraine, he doesnt give a crap about anyone else or what they think

[Beso]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

russia wouldnt ask anyone before nuking someone, china wouldnt ask russia and neither would north korea

For that matter, we wouldn't ask anyone either if someone had nuked us, no country would

Putin has made up an entire fake narrative to go to war with ukraine, he doesnt give a crap about anyone else or what they think

I never mentioned us nuking them

I said bomb them, but I meant bomb them like they are bombing ukraine.

[arista]

Another Shocking report
Ch4HDnews
Children were shot in a car at the checkpoint
By Russian Troops


They showed them in a hospital.