[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

You shouldn't do yourself dirty Sheriff, you're more intelligent than jet.

I don't even say that to be offensive really. It's just a fairly obvious fact.

Absolutely no one will agree with you.

See the problem is you have no real interest in the royals but jet not on has an interest but a passion for them

If he was on master mind his main subject would be modern day royals

And that’s what you don’t get or respect.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Absolutely no one will agree with you.

See the problem is you have no real interest in the royals but jet not on has an interest but a passion for them

If he was on master mind his main subject would be modern day royals

And that’s what you don’t get or respect.

Knowledge of a specialist subject isn't the same as intelligence, and expertise shouldn't be biased.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Knowledge of a specialist subject isn't the same as intelligence, and expertise shouldn't be biased.

neither should intelligence nor entertainment value be defined by personally insulting other forum members. Take a look back at what you have been posting SB, are you proud of yourself?

[user104658]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

neither should intelligence nor entertainment value be defined by personally insulting other forum members. Take a look back at what you have been posting SB, are you proud of yourself?

it doesn't really come into it, I'm not proud to be on TiBB at all any more, it's lurched into being something that leaves a foul taste no matter how you try to interact with it. TiBB SD's is a bar fight, not a chess match.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

it doesn't really come into it, I'm not proud to be on TiBB at all any more, it's lurched into being something that leaves a foul taste no matter how you try to interact with it. TiBB SD's is a bar fight, not a chess match.

That's honestly sad to read.

I feel like TIBB should be a place where everyone can have fun, I mean this Forum has probably had more iconic moments over the years than BB itself.

I personally think that everyone needs to just maybe take a breather, and go to other topics on the Forum for a bit, because it does seem like Political or Royal Family discussions descend into falling outs as it currently stands.

[Ammi]

…this is feeling a bit…well, more than a bit like a pack mentality against Soldier Boy because he’s very much of a different mindset to many posters on the topic of ‘Royal’ in all its different and varied forms…I know that he doesn’t need me to say that, he’s big and ugly enough to look after himself etc…but I can’t ever not comment on a ‘bully mentality’ if I see it…

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Knowledge of a specialist subject isn't the same as intelligence, and expertise shouldn't be biased.

One jet is not biased, you can’t argue with facts , facts that have been to be true

Intelligence is based on the ideas of understanding and learning using learned knowledge to your advantage

[user104658]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

One jet is not biased, you can’t argue with facts , facts that have been to be true

Bias doesn't need to be about lying. If you focus exclusively on the positives of one side and refuse to acknowledge valid criticisms, and focus exclusively on the negatives of the other and refuse to acknowledge any merit, of course you get bias.

In this case you get a straight-up silly scenario where some people are painted as irredeemable villains and the other as perfect paragons who can do absolutely no wrong - when in reality, they are all just people, as messy as anyone else and with complex and complicated relationships. A royal historian in 200 years time will be fascinated by the family dynamics of princes William and Harry and their complicated relationship with Charles, in a totally neutral and realistic way. DO you think there are going to be history books that say "William and Kate were nice and wonderful people and parents who never set a foot out of line, his brother unfortunately was a ginger demon who wanted to cause nothing but ruin!!"? Those are cartoon characters, not real descriptions of events with any sort of validity.

I'd bloody love it if there was a genuine, open, unbiased and good-faith thread about the Royals on this forum but there literally never has been. Not one.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

Bias doesn't need to be about lying. If you focus exclusively on the positives of one side and refuse to acknowledge valid criticisms, and focus exclusively on the negatives of the other and refuse to acknowledge any merit, of course you get bias.

In this case you get a straight-up silly scenario where some people are painted as irredeemable villains and the other as perfect paragons who can do absolutely no wrong - when in reality, they are all just people, as messy as anyone else and with complex and complicated relationships. A royal historian in 200 years time will be fascinated by the family dynamics of princes William and Harry and their complicated relationship with Charles, in a totally neutral and realistic way. DO you think there are going to be history books that say "William and Kate were nice and wonderful people and parents who never set a foot out of line, his brother unfortunately was a ginger demon who wanted to cause nothing but ruin!!"? Those are cartoon characters, not real descriptions of events with any sort of validity.

I'd bloody love it if there was a genuine, open, unbiased and good-faith thread about the Royals on this forum but there literally never has been. Not one.

You can only go on what you see , the problem with harry and Meghan they have sent themselves up as people that others should look up to
They are down as people wanted to save the planet while taking private jets every where for made up awards

Saying they are all about family while attacking their own

Then you come to the royals doing what no one on this forum would do in exchange for their so called privileges

When there is wrong doing i will say because im out spoken but until you have the evidence of wrong doing you have nothing to base your argument on