Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherie
Apart from being **** at her job, why was she in post in the first place, surely her views on the needs of survivors should have been raised at interview. I am sure there are plenty women qualified to do the job and it would be more appropriate to put someone in post who was born a women particularly in a Rape Crisis Centre for women, it would be similar to placing a transwoman in a domestic refuge for women do you agree? its connected because women are being put at a disadvantage in every walk of life to appease a very small percentage of the community
|
We weren't in the interview, so we do not know the ability of other applicants, how they interviewed, their background, experience, situation, if they were offered the role and turned it down, etc... you are assuming that because a Trans person was hired that it was a diversity hire specifically and then you're using that hire and the fact they weren't good at their job (like millions of other people who have been fired or resigned throughout life) to extrapolate that to being a threat/disadvantage to bio women.
Women's biggest threat is straight cis biological men... Not trans women.