[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Quantum Boy

As we can clearly see, some people believe that young women should be concerned with prettying themselves up for the benefit of middle aged men. Even gay young women. It's a level of bizarre entitlement that definitely, definitely doesn't lead to people living all alone with their dogs like......... Mickey Rourke.....

I think LT was trying to be derogatory without appearing to be derogatory imo.

Bless

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Beso

All charges dropped and the couple reconciled..NOT a wife beater.

Literally meaningless; reading up on it it sounds like it was in public. Charges dropped and a couple staying together (they ultimately were divorced a few years later by the way) doesn't mean he wasn't abusive. Also;

"In her memoir, Carre stated that Rourke threatened to kill himself if she didn't marry him and that Rourke would often leave her alone for days at a time, while he would be out partying and sleeping with other women. They had separate bedrooms toward the end. When she threatened to leave him he held a gun to her head and would threaten her friends and business associates. He had the phones tapped, and hired people to keep tabs on her."

And he's pals with Johnny Depp. Guess **** clumps together.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Livia

She's suggesting he should not be on the show because he was "charged" with domestic violence. What's the point of posting her comments unless it's to try to implicate him, I wonder?

The charges were dropped because his ex and himself reconciled and she just never showed up in court not because Police found that the original claims were untrue. Nothing she said was untrue there, all she said was he was charged with DV and that he made threatening remarks to Jojo which he did (joke or not)

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

The charges were dropped because his ex and himself reconciled and she just never showed up in court not because Police found that the original claims were untrue. Nothing she said was untrue there, all she said was he was charged with DV and that he made threatening remarks to Jojo which he did (joke or not)

Regardless or how and why the charges were dropped, he is not guilty of a crime till he's found guilty. So again, what was she hoping to get out of posting that other than to imply his guilt?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Livia

Regardless or how and why the charges were dropped, he is not guilty of a crime till he's found guilty. So again, what was she hoping to get out of posting that other than to imply his guilt?

Makes no difference what she was implying, she stated he was charged with DV which was correct so how could she be sued for slander by him?

[vesavius]

Originally Posted by Quantum Boy

Literally meaningless; reading up on it it sounds like it was in public. Charges dropped and a couple staying together (they ultimately were divorced a few years later by the way) doesn't mean he wasn't abusive. Also;

"In her memoir, Carre stated that Rourke threatened to kill himself if she didn't marry him and that Rourke would often leave her alone for days at a time, while he would be out partying and sleeping with other women. They had separate bedrooms toward the end. When she threatened to leave him he held a gun to her head and would threaten her friends and business associates. He had the phones tapped, and hired people to keep tabs on her."

And he's pals with Johnny Depp. Guess **** clumps together.

I mean, all that's damning. At least it is if we agree to take unsupported accusations and extremely jaundiced self serving versions of events as truth... Memoirs are often full of bullshit.

Was he abusive? Maybe. Maybe he wasn't and she is just a liar. False accusation is as real as abuse and is actually a form of abuse and women can be as abusive as men (though the forms that abuse takes is ofc often very different). I am not saying this is her, I don't know her, but I am saying that we know neither of them or the real story of events.

But, going from the court case with Heard, in that case... Depp did nuthin wrong.

[Ammi]

…just a by the by but touching on lawsuits…I didn’t realise that Mickey Rourke was such an anti Trump person, having referred to him as a ‘garbage can’ and it’s entirely personal…

…apparently back in the 1990’s, Donald Trump sued Mickey and Tupac Shakur…/…not sure what the lawsuit was…

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Makes no difference what she was implying, she stated he was charged with DV which was correct so how could she be sued for slander by him?

It's not my area of expertise. Nor yours. But again, why bother posting it? I'd be interested to know what a lawyer who does specialise in libel - not slander, that much I do know - would make of it. Jojo made a big thing of 'intention. It applies here too, I reckon.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Livia

It's not my area of expertise. Nor yours. But again, why bother posting it? I'd be interested to know what a lawyer who does specialise in libel - not slander, that much I do know - would make of it. Jojo made a big thing of 'intention. It applies here too, I reckon.

Sorry libel and no it isn't my area of expertise But I'm pretty sure the statement would have to be false for someone to sue for libel, her statement isn't false, in fact it was supported by a newspaper report saying the exact words she said, that he was charged with Domestic Violence which he was

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Ammi

…just a by the by but touching on lawsuits…I didn’t realise that Mickey Rourke was such an anti Trump person, having referred to him as a ‘garbage can’ and it’s entirely personal…

…apparently back in the 1990’s, Donald Trump sued Mickey and Tupac Shakur…/…not sure what the lawsuit was…

https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...-bitch-191940/

Interesting little read

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Sorry libel and no it isn't my area of expertise But I'm pretty sure the statement would have to be false for someone to sue for libel, her statement isn't false, in fact it was supported by a newspaper report saying the exact words she said, that he was charged with Domestic Violence which he was

I bet there's a lawsuit of some kind there.

I mean, America...

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by Swan

https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...-bitch-191940/

Interesting little read

…well then…he’s still a bit undecided about Donald…?…


…(…we’re proper Danny Beard gossip girls, tbh…..)….

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Swan

https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...-bitch-191940/

Interesting little read

and expressed his desire to have 30 seconds in a room “with the little bitch” to give him a piece of his mind.


But he's lost enough of it already

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

I bet there's a lawsuit of some kind there.

I mean, America...

Meh doubtful, what she posted is true

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Sorry libel and no it isn't my area of expertise But I'm pretty sure the statement would have to be false for someone to sue for libel, her statement isn't false, in fact it was supported by a newspaper report saying the exact words she said, that he was charged with Domestic Violence which he was

She's clearly tried to defame him. I don't get why she made a deal of a non-story. We can agree to disagree.

[Jessica.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Meh doubtful, what she posted is true

Yeah, I think anyone would be upset if their partner was treated like that and it's true that there was a lawsuit, I think they just wanted to share something negative that they found out about Mickey to add more context to the kind of person they perceive him to be.

[Maru]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

I bet there's a lawsuit of some kind there.

I mean, America...

There has to be hope, Oliver lol... can't be "I'm mad today! I am going to call my lawyers right now..." .. would be like flogging oneself in the bank account to the delight of others and maybe making a judge super mad in the process.

Now.. flogging both sides in the bank account in a dubious but abusive use of the legal system and maybe stretching legal language to some limits using a loophole... this is the way...

[Gusto Brunt]

JoJo, likes to come across as a very confident person, but I think she is very immature and if anyone is sure of a nervous breakdown in there it's her.

Okay, Mickey's homophobic comments are that of a dinosaur. I don't blame him, it's just he's a very old man who was born and raised in a different era, and he never had to adjust his way of thinking because he's old and rich and doesn't give a ****.

There isn't anything to JoJo. I don't know what she does on social media to make her 'so popular' but I find her shallow and meh.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Gusto Brunt

JoJo, likes to come across as a very confident person, but I think she is very immature and if anyone is sure of a nervous breakdown in there it's her.

Okay, Mickey's homophobic comments are that of a dinosaur. I don't blame him, it's just he's a very old man who was born and raised in a different era, and he never had to adjust his way of thinking because he's old and rich and doesn't give a ****.

There isn't anything to JoJo. I don't know what she does on social media to make her 'so popular' but I find her shallow and meh.

Same ^^^^

[Chilltown]

JoJo is obnoxious and extremely fake

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Chilltown

JoJo is obnoxious and extremely fake

Those are her good points

LoL

[vesavius]

Originally Posted by Gusto Brunt

JoJo, likes to come across as a very confident person, but I think she is very immature and if anyone is sure of a nervous breakdown in there it's her.

I agree that she is probably very fragile under her public shell.

This is a girl that's been on TV since the age of 9, raised in the world of competitive dance and has been continuously judged, mocked, and criticised all her life, both in private and online.

She has clearly constructed this fake big persona to deal with that but the speed that she crumbled in the face of a joke does show that her defence is very brittle.

I know 21 is an adult, but not every 21 year old is an adult, if that makes sense.

Anyhow, I am not actually her target demographic by a longshot, her whole 'gaypop' thing is cringy to me, but I am gonna extend her kindness for the time being. I don't think anything she has done is out of malice or spite and she has been one of the more interesting ones in there so far.

[Crimson Dynamo]

She is captured by leftist woke ideology and activism

She will grow out of it

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

With all he make up off she looks like a 1970s tomboy

What's wrong with 1970's tomboys?

Do they look like the current England women's Football team?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

What's wrong with 1970's tomboys?

Do they look like the current England women's Football team?

why do you think there is something wrong?