[Ammi]

Originally Posted by bots

i think he probably had a bullet point list of topics that he knew from history would be seen as controversial and just worked his way through the list. He probably put the list together 10 mins before going in the house which accounted for the lack of depth. You can tell when someone is sincere, passionate and knowledgeable about the topics he was discussing .... and he wasn't

…I mean, regardless of our own feelings and views etc and whether we agree with someone or are completely opposed, even…?…the common factor is generally the passion with people who are politically engaged and with social issues etc…and no more so that in today’s world with social media and voices having to raise themselves up loud and proud as it’s so easy to feel drowned out, you know…?…I mean it might just be George’s way as well of how he expresses himself but this is BB and we’re looking for passion and engagement and huge thought going into etc…we’re a hard crowd to please…but it’s like, hmmmmmmm…he would retreat so easily, as if he never believed in what he was saying in the first place…but he knew that it would get highlight airtime clicks…