Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 26-10-2009, 02:29 PM #19
Prole Prole is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,892
Prole Prole is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,892
Default

Could it be that the photograph was deliberately provocative to highlight the sexualisation of children in our society? My five year old neice is having a birthday party this week, where she and her little friends visit a place that puts make up on them, paints their nails, does their hair... you can buy children's clothes in the high street that'll make them look like King's Cross hookers and they're allowed to watch all kinds of crap on TV that's far too old for them. I'm all for the protection of children but maybe this photo is simply polarising the fact that children are now sexualised at a very early age, sometimes by the people who love them and want to protect them the most.
__________________
What if the Hokey Cokey really is what it's all about
Prole is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
 

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
brooke, lose, nude, shields, tate, thousands

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts