[Brekkie]

Glad they've had the sense to axe the crowd tomorrow, but ridiculous yet again the producers don't get that Celebrity BB runs just 3-4 weeks, not 13 weeks, so HMs should be evicted at every possible opportunity - not added to the mix. The only celeb worth the late entrance tomorrow would be Pamela Anderson.

And if as it looks the first eviction isn't until Day 13, that would be the latest first eviction in all series since BB2.

[President]

Originally Posted by Brekkie

Glad they've had the sense to axe the crowd tomorrow, but ridiculous yet again the producers don't get that Celebrity BB runs just 3-4 weeks, not 13 weeks, so HMs should be evicted at every possible opportunity - not added to the mix. The only celeb worth the late entrance tomorrow would be Pamela Anderson.

And if as it looks the first eviction isn't until Day 13, that would be the latest first eviction in all series since BB2.

I actually think it's a good idea that they're not having an eviction tomorrow.

If there was an eviction taking place, then Stephen would have probably been evicted. He's been an entertaining housemate so far so that's the last thing the producers would want at this early stage.

So what if the first eviction is later than normal? They could have a double next Friday, easy.

[Brekkie]

Originally Posted by President

I actually think it's a good idea that they're not having an eviction tomorrow.

If there was an eviction taking place, then Stephen would have probably been evicted. He's been an entertaining housemate so far so that's the last thing the producers would want at this early stage.

The producers shouldn't be scared of that though, especially as time and time again in previous series it's been shown when you get rid of a dominant character, other storylines then begin to develop. Leave them in too long and viewers soon get bored - and frankly we were all bored of Steven by Day 2.

[Joe.]

I reckon it is a new housemate. But I'm glad there's no eviction, in a way. Last year we saw Beinizir leave only 4 days in, we didn't really get to know her, yet again it'd be nice to have an eviction, but on Sunday and then the second on friday. Actually, it's a mistake, their should be an entrance and an eviction!

[President]

Originally Posted by Brekkie

The producers shouldn't be scared of that though, especially as time and time again in previous series it's been shown when you get rid of a dominant character, other storylines then begin to develop. Leave them in too long and viewers soon get bored - and frankly we were all bored of Steven by Day 2.

Speak for yourself. Not all of us are bored by Stephen. I agree that there's too much focus on him at the moment, but he's much more entertaining than people like Dane Bowers or Sisqo who seem to do nothing.

I don't want one housemate to dominate the show, just like you. But the show's better off with Stephen in the house for longer. The editing could be improved to ensure there's not too much focus on Steve.

I understand your views about the show only being 4 weeks long and that you want an eviction in the first week. But I think it could all work out fine, if this happens:

Week 1 Friday - one goes in
Week 2 Friday - double eviction (10 left)
Week 3 Monday - eviction (9 left)
Week 3 Friday - double eviction (7 left)
Week 4 Monday - double eviction (5 left)
Week 4 Friday- final

Frankly, I don't think there's anything wrong with that. A double eviction on the final Monday, then no further evictions until the final.

If it means that the bigger characters are in the show for a week longer, then it's fine by me.

[Joe.]

Originally Posted by President

Week 1 Friday - one goes in
Week 2 Friday - double eviction (10 left)
Week 3 Monday - eviction (9 left)
Week 3 Friday - double eviction (7 left)
Week 4 Monday - double eviction (5 left)
Week 4 Friday- final

That sounds logical. However what if 6 are in the final this year? It could happen. It happened in BB8 as far as I remember, and other years? I'd prefer 5 but has it been confirmed that 5 are definatly in the final?

[arista]

Originally Posted by RachelRiceFan10.0

That sounds logical. However what if 6 are in the final this year? It could happen. It happened in BB8 as far as I remember, and other years? I'd prefer 5 but has it been confirmed that 5 are definatly in the final?

Also what if a few Walk out?

[Joe.]

Originally Posted by arista

Also what if a few Walk out?

Exactly, well basically that disrupts the whole structure of the show.They might have to cancel an eviction or two if someone walks out. The main thing is they need 5 or 6 housemates for the final, that's the bottom line, so from now until the 27th they need to get rid of some.

[President]

Originally Posted by RachelRiceFan10.0

That sounds logical. However what if 6 are in the final this year? It could happen. It happened in BB8 as far as I remember, and other years? I'd prefer 5 but has it been confirmed that 5 are definatly in the final?

Since BB9, they've had 5 in the final which I think is the right number. 6 is too much, while 4 is okay but that just won't happen.

[Joe.]

Originally Posted by President

Since BB9, they've had 5 in the final which I think is the right number. 6 is too much, while 4 is okay but that just won't happen.

6 is too much, 5 is perfect and yes, 4 would be ok. But It's most likely it'll be 5, unless someone walks on the penultimate day, which is VERY unlikely