[Ghostinthehouse]

Originally Posted by MissKittyFantastico

Underage is one thing, calling someone a paedophile for making a mistake is quite another.

Get off your moral high horse and actually go learn what the word means ffs.

LOL. You really don't see it do you. What Sisqo has done is wrong and ILLEGAL. Duh. Sisqo was sexually attracted to a 14 year old child - paedo. Simple.

And 14 years old IS a child. Even if you pretend in your head it isn't.

You think it's a 'moral high horse' to think it is WRONG to have sex with a 14 year old child. WTF?????

Then you're going to find the court, the police, the social services, the public are all on their 'moral high horses' when it comes to underage sex. Duh.

[MissKittyFantastico]

Originally Posted by Ghostinthehouse

LOL. You really don't see it do you. What Sisqo has done is wrong and ILLEGAL. Duh. Sisqo was sexually attracted to a 14 year old child - paedo. Simple.

And 14 years old IS a child. Even if you pretend in your head it isn't.

You think it's a 'moral high horse' to think it is WRONG to have sex with a 14 year old child. WTF?????

Then you're going to find the court, the police, the social services, the public are all on their 'moral high horses' when it comes to underage sex. Duh.

When did I ever say it wasn't wrong?

But why can't you get it through your head that he thought she was OLDER ie he is not attracted to YOUNG children, therefore he is NOT a paedophile?

No argument from me that what he did was illegal, but the question was about him being a paedo or not and he blatantly isn't. DUH.

[Stu]

Originally Posted by Ghostinthehouse

LOL. You really don't see it do you. What Sisqo has done is wrong and ILLEGAL. Duh. Sisqo was sexually attracted to a 14 year old child - paedo. Simple.

And 14 years old IS a child. Even if you pretend in your head it isn't.

You think it's a 'moral high horse' to think it is WRONG to have sex with a 14 year old child. WTF?????

Then you're going to find the court, the police, the social services, the public are all on their 'moral high horses' when it comes to underage sex. Duh.

You still don't get it, do you? She is not saying what he did was right. Or legal. So from that stance then yes, you are taking a moral highground. Any debate that involves you calling people who disagree with you paedophiles is taking a moral highground.

You are brilliant at this whole putting words in peoples mouths business.

[bananarama]

Originally Posted by Ghostinthehouse

LOL. You really don't see it do you. What Sisqo has done is wrong and ILLEGAL. Duh. Sisqo was sexually attracted to a 14 year old child - paedo. Simple.

And 14 years old IS a child. Even if you pretend in your head it isn't.

You think it's a 'moral high horse' to think it is WRONG to have sex with a 14 year old child. WTF?????

Then you're going to find the court, the police, the social services, the public are all on their 'moral high horses' when it comes to underage sex. Duh.

I am afraid it is thee that does not see........None so blind as those that do not want to see or those that are high on a morality goody goody tirade........

As other have pointed out it is so so simple..If he definitely thought she was an adult. Mother nature can do this you know along with make up. He was foolish to be fooled maybe but he is only a paedo if he knew her age and if he was attracted to her age........

A man attracted to who looks and behaves like an adult is not a paedo.