[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

Compassion 'mercy killing' they say?
Well I wonder what the murder victim has to say about that?
Oh right.. he killed him.

One of the reasons we have murder trials is to try and determine these things. You don't get to commit homicide and later tell people it doesn't need to be investigated.. after all you are a reporter so... just believe me.

My guess is.. he was getting older and really wanted to sodomize as many young men as possible. Get high and slutty in the gay clubs or whatever the scene.
This guy was holding him back.
Sure.. he was getting almost saint-like glorious status from 'helping his dying lover' and got a lot out of that,
but,
All that back patting, high status, praises was also why he could not do other guys.
He wanted his partner dead.
Collect on it.
Get it over with.
Then get to those drug parties and reckless sex.

Maybe?
Cops have these 'instincts' right off the top. a 'hunch'. the gut feeling.

Hope your not on the jury then - talk about preconceptions!

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

Hope your not on the jury then - talk about preconceptions!

this is what the cops have to think however

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

Hope your not on the jury then - talk about preconceptions!

You would hope I was on the jury if you were the murdered mans parents or family and friends,
but,
Actually police do have to investigate that possibility. They will also investigate his claim it was an act of desperate 'mercy killing' to.

I'd be worried about you investigating crimes and accepting his story because you feel he is gay and cannot be wrong.
Or would you?

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

You would hope I was on the jury if you were the murdered mans parents or family and friends,
but,
Actually police do have to investigate that possibility. They will also investigate his claim it was an act of desperate 'mercy killing' to.

I'd be worried about you investigating crimes and accepting his story because you feel he is gay and cannot be wrong.
Or would you?

I don't think that - but I think that everything points to it being a mercy killing. Of course it would have to be investigated - but I think my view is far more likely than yours!

[arista]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

I don't think that - but I think that everything points to it being a mercy killing. Of course it would have to be investigated - but I think my view is far more likely than yours!

But you are Not Permitted to Use the Bloated BBC
for this Death Platform.


This Reflects on the BBC.

[BB_Eye]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

You would hope I was on the jury if you were the murdered mans parents or family and friends,
but,
Actually police do have to investigate that possibility. They will also investigate his claim it was an act of desperate 'mercy killing' to.

I'd be worried about you investigating crimes and accepting his story because you feel he is gay and cannot be wrong.
Or would you?

No, that is all in your head, because you are homophobic and feel the need to remind us that you are every time you post it seems. Wombai never even referred to the fact he was gay. You pulled that one out of your ass.

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

No, that is all in your head, because you are homophobic and feel the need to remind us that you are every time you post it seems. Wombai never even referred to the fact he was gay. You pulled that one out of your ass.

BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.

I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.

I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?

You can't put words in people's mouths - saying they supported someone because the person is gay, when they never mentioned about them being gay. That is simply an assumption - which rather invalidates your point!

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by WOMBAI

You can't put words in people's mouths - saying they supported someone because the person is gay, when they never mentioned about them being gay. That is simply an assumption - which rather invalidates your point!

No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.

So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.

So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.

Sounds like you are every '...ist' going! Anti gay, anti women, anti anyone different from you!

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

No, it does not invalidate my point.
but,
I was not wrong here either. You said you would be afraid of (then made up some things) if I was on a jury.
I said I would be afraid of (suspicions) if you were.

So you are actually 'double-wrong' in your cognition here. Which is something you really need a female brain to pull off here.

Your comments were based on assumptions - not facts - simple as! And your assumptions were wrong, therefore so was your point! Who has it 'double-wrong' now then? Just your wee male brain pulling off another dumb moment!

[BB_Eye]

Originally Posted by ElProximo

BS. You just said that because you are intolerant against homophobes.

I don't know who Wombai is but whatever I said still stands whether or not you tried to make some 'clever' type of rhetorical turnabout on it.
Speaking of which;
Who told you I was NOT gay?

If you are, then I'm lost for words. Why do you resent the people who have changed the law to give us the same rights as everyone else?

[ElProximo]

Originally Posted by BB_Eye

If you are, then I'm lost for words. Why do you resent the people who have changed the law to give us the same rights as everyone else?

We already had the exact same rights before and after (regardless of whether you talk UK or Canada or USA where some states tried this).

One adult man had every right to marry one adult woman (I know more conditions apply) and that was the same for you, me or anyone else. There was 100% equal standards for all.