[BBGermany]

Originally Posted by Jords

He had a very bully-like nature, espicially with Rachael. Cant believe he was liked for so long. Anyway he climbed high and fell from it so dont care now aha!
However its not the fact somebody made somebody else cry which makes them a bully though, that could just be based on the sensitivity of that person. Ulrika is very sensitive, she cried loads in CBB6.

But what I was trying to say was according to some, Nadia was/is a bully cause she made a couple of HMs cry.
John James did the same thing made a few HMs cry, and IMO was more aggressive than Nadia was towards some. But yet people don't call him one.
all cause he is "in love" with Josie

[Jords]

Originally Posted by BBGermany

But what I was trying to say was according to some, Nadia was/is a bully cause she made a couple of HMs cry.
John James did the same thing made a few HMs cry, and IMO was more aggressive than Nadia was towards some. But yet people don't call him one.
all cause he is "in love" with Josie

Oh I see, yepp I totally agree with you there!

[MassiveTruck]

Originally Posted by BBGermany

But what I was trying to say was according to some, Nadia was/is a bully cause she made a couple of HMs cry.
John James did the same thing made a few HMs cry, and IMO was more aggressive than Nadia was towards some. But yet people don't call him one.
all cause he is "in love" with Josie

Whether it was fake or not, and I am not excusing John James here but he did try to redeem himself and try to apologise and remain on good terms with people.

It wasn't merely Nadia's behaviour but her arrogance and egoism that was shocking. The smirking when others struggled and fell and the overall dominance she hoped for.

It's a whole package of things. I'm not saying John James was completely innocent or remotely - he was a game player but people cannot argue completely, efficiently if somebody offers apology or some glimmer of redemption.

Nadia did little of that if any. It's just people weren't going to accept tears at the end of a war she started and prolonged.

The producers are to blame in a huge respect but naivety isn't always an excuse. On that note, look at Nikki and Ulrika? Hugely clued up about the game and so is Michelle! The difference between Ulrika and Nikki against Michelle is, Michelle doesn't appear to have any intention to drag others down - Nikki and Ulrika do.

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by MassiveTruck

Whether it was fake or not, and I am not excusing John James here but he did try to redeem himself and try to apologise and remain on good terms with people.

It wasn't merely Nadia's behaviour but her arrogance and egoism that was shocking. The smirking when others struggled and fell and the overall dominance she hoped for.

It's a whole package of things. I'm not saying John James was completely innocent or remotely - he was a game player but people cannot argue completely, efficiently if somebody offers apology or some glimmer of redemption.

Nadia did little of that if any. It's just people weren't going to accept tears at the end of a war she started and prolonged.

The producers are to blame in a huge respect but naivety isn't always an excuse. On that note, look at Nikki and Ulrika? Hugely clued up about the game and so is Michelle! The difference between Ulrika and Nikki against Michelle is, Michelle doesn't appear to have any intention to drag others down - Nikki and Ulrika do.

So your avoiding my question>?

C'mon your full of opinions usually

[setanta]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

So your avoiding my question>?

C'mon your full of opinions usually

Well, he's full of something alright.

[MassiveTruck]

Originally Posted by flamingGalah!

Wow, you really are completely ignorant aren't you...

Here lies the real reason you dislike Nadia... disgusting.

Originally Posted by setanta

Well, he's full of something alright.

That reply that I sent to him is appropriate to you.

One man's ignorance is another man's knowledge. You're too ignorant to know the truth in all this because your knowledge is from the charity posters while the rest of us able to play with a few opinions at the same time than the one, can see beyond that.

Seriously? Do you think this half-hearted judgemental lameness you espouse when you spend all your time on the internet cuts it? Do you really think with your huge post counts thinking "ooh, we're all for equality because we empathise even though we haven't had our genitalia removed or read a decent study in our lives" can run past me.

Just because you are politically correct and you fall along the below-average intelligent neo-liberal view that everything goes, doesn't mean you are smart - it simply means you find it harder to deal with every day life so you try and express (and you do Setanta, you really do, all over this forum) that you are all for everything, you accept everything, I listen to great music, I watch great films - oh anything, anything that is sold to you by the big budget media companies completely blind to the fact they're playing you like a fiddle with the selling points they're passing across to you.

So seriously, think twice when you're trying to say you know better than others with your vindictive scathing and abrasive attacks on forum members with the excuse "ooh, we really care for any old charity case in the media so we have every right to abuse and insult you"... because it doesn't cut it because you live here!!