Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyramid*
Hey, don't get all defensive and pissed off because you were unable to articulate what you meant - funny how some of you on here have a sense of humour when it suits you when you're poking fun at others but you lose that same sense of humour when it's fired right back at you. I'm glad you find me amazing, though I really have to insist that you don't go down on bended knee and worship. There' really no need although the sentiment was nice.
As for the question you asked: you'd be better asking the reporter who supplied the article: if you actually took the time to read it, you will find that the reporter was doing a fair amount of mud slinging in the article. So if you want to know what attracted the critisism of Cher in that article- the article gives you quite a few clues.
|
I think my reply was pretty appropiate considering the nature of your response. The "see" really was entirely irrelevant to the post yet you thought you'd try and use it to post a condascending respone while completely missing the point of what I said. Besides we did see her on tv every week and it was from seeing her that we can make a judgement on her voice
I did reas the article and it was what I expected from the Daily Mail, it was a load of biased crap wholly influenced by his unjustified hatred of Cher. And as always the readers lap it up