[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by marney

Yes they may be opinions but was he detained on these opinions, I doubt it. So you are still no better by calling these people Gobby, I hope they SUE AS YOU KEEP HINTING JEFFERIES SHOULD.

Morbid interest in death I wouldn't trust anyone like that even if he was not actually the killer JUST MY OPINION THOUGH.

Gob$hites I'd really call them. To be precise.

You hope they sue me!!!

... that's fricking hilarious!!! Yeah - sue me for having an opinion on them mouthing off to the press!!

Difference is Marney: my opinion isn't casting doubt on their killing intentions or offering enough opinion to give rise to public speculation by people (like you, who read far too much into other people's opinions) - for me to form the view that an innocent man could therefore be a killer. Do you see what I'm getting at here? My opinion isn't likely to damage them in any way shape or form. They gave opinions at a crucial point where their words may have been damaging to CJ. I gave my view on their opinions and of the damage their opinions had.

Oh and seeing as you're still unable absorb precisely what I have said over and over again: I don't hint that CJ should sue the media - no hinting from me, I'm absolutely behind him if he and his legal team should wish to do so. 100%. That's 100% back up from me.

I'd far prefer to trust a person who had interest in death and dying, that trust a person who was willing to find an innocent man guilty when they had no real reason to do so - other than gossip that they read in low rate tabloids.

[marney]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Gob$hites I'd really call them. To be precise.

You hope they sue me!!!

... that's fricking hilarious!!! Yeah - sue me for having an opinion on them mouthing off to the press!!

Difference is Marney: my opinion isn't casting doubt on their killing intentions or offering enough opinion to give rise to public speculation by people (like you, who read far too much into other people's opinions) - for me to form the view that an innocent man could therefore be a killer. Do you see what I'm getting at here? My opinion isn't likely to damage them in any way shape or form. They gave opinions at a crucial point where their words may have been damaging to CJ. I gave my view on their opinions and of the damage their opinions had.

Oh and seeing as you're still unable absorb precisely what I have said over and over again: I don't hint that CJ should sue the media - no hinting from me, I'm absolutely behind him if he and his legal team should wish to do so. 100%. That's 100% back up from me.

I'd far prefer to trust a person who had interest in death and dying, that trust a person who was willing to find an innocent man guilty when they had no real reason to do so - other than gossip that they read in low rate tabloids.

What's Happened To The Landlord?

Martin Brunt January 23, 2011 10:32 AM

Now the police say they've got their man, Vincent Tabak, for the Jo Yeates murder, there is one big question.

What about her landlord Chris Jefferies, the first suspect who fiercely denied any guilt?

He might have thought he would be eliminated now.

The police told me: "In the light of this latest development we are now considering the impact of this on other aspects of the investigation."

So, officially, he's still a suspect and still on bail.

Last heard of, his lawyers were sifting through media reports of his arrest and exploring legal action for defamation against various outlets.

The rather eccentric former public school master seemed to be gearing up for a major assault on journalists.

So, what's going on?

Oh, and another question.

Why didn't police arrest Mr. Tabak earlier?

Living next door to the victim he must have been a major 'person of interest' to the murder squad.

The golden rule for detectives on any investigation is to "clear the ground under your feet."

The policy is to TIE - trace, interview and eliminate - all those emotionally and physically close to the victim.

Mr. Tabak couldn't really have been any closer, physically. A few feet most of the time.

[Shasown]

Originally Posted by marney

What's Happened To The Landlord?

Martin Brunt January 23, 2011 10:32 AM

Now the police say they've got their man, Vincent Tabak, for the Jo Yeates murder, there is one big question.

What about her landlord Chris Jefferies, the first suspect who fiercely denied any guilt?

He might have thought he would be eliminated now.

The police told me: "In the light of this latest development we are now considering the impact of this on other aspects of the investigation."

So, officially, he's still a suspect and still on bail.

Last heard of, his lawyers were sifting through media reports of his arrest and exploring legal action for defamation against various outlets.

The rather eccentric former public school master seemed to be gearing up for a major assault on journalists.

So, what's going on?

Oh, and another question.

Why didn't police arrest Mr. Tabak earlier?

Living next door to the victim he must have been a major 'person of interest' to the murder squad.

The golden rule for detectives on any investigation is to "clear the ground under your feet."

The policy is to TIE - trace, interview and eliminate - all those emotionally and physically close to the victim.

Mr. Tabak couldn't really have been any closer, physically. A few feet most of the time.

Martin Brunt crime correspondent? Seems like he knows next to nothing doesnt it? It also seems like he is attempting to distance himself from the feeding frenzy like witch hunt the media decided to engage in regarding Jefferies.

Chris Jeffries could still be on bail while the police continue investigations into not only the murder itself but also any other crimes he may be suspected of which may or may not have come to light during the investigation.

They didnt arrest Tabak for a couple of reasons, they initially didnt suspect him, they had no evidence (they didnt attempt to arrest Tabak until after they had viewed the tapes from the old fellow down the roads's CCTV and the tapes from the Severn Bridge CCTV), they were building up a case including crime profile etc.

But perhaps the biggest reason is, he wasnt in the country. Its a bit difficult attempting to arrest someone when they arent in the same country, let alone county.

Besides until they interviewed him they still may not have had enough evidence to ask the Dutch Police to arrest and extradite for questioning. And they may have wanted not to scare him into running or fighting an extradition hearing.

Leaving Jefferies on bail would also have reassured Tabak to some extent that the police didnt suspect him.

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

The mother of Vincent Tabak broke her silence last night to back her son – insisting he was acting ‘normally’ in the week following Joanna Yeates’s death.

Mr Tabak left Bristol for a family holiday in Holland two days after Miss Yeates was reported missing.
He was only arrested last week after his return to the UK.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz1BoZdmKPF

Originally Posted by marney

What's Happened To The Landlord?

Martin Brunt January 23, 2011 10:32 AM

Oh, and another question.

Why didn't police arrest Mr. Tabak earlier?

Living next door to the victim he must have been a major 'person of interest' to the murder squad.

The golden rule for detectives on any investigation is to "clear the ground under your feet."

The policy is to TIE - trace, interview and eliminate - all those emotionally and physically close to the victim.

Mr. Tabak couldn't really have been any closer, physically. A few feet most of the time.

I'm afraid someone's geography and ability to work out distances isn't so good. Holland is more than a few feet away. Tabak was in Holland.

As for CJ?

' They had interviewed Miss Yeates’s landlord but nothing materialised from it and there was no concrete evidence linking him in any way to the murder.

‘It appears he had brought himself under suspicion by making a series of comments which now appear to be irrelevant and innocuous. There was no case against him.’

No one (genera public) knows why CJ has bail conditions placed upon him - for all we know, it could be something totally unconnected altogether .