[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by MTVN

I'm talking about the Undercover Mosque documentary. As far as I remember that didnt feature content of children being hit, the program focused on the nature of the teaching and preaching at certain mosques. It was investigated immediately - something you are presuming they are not going to do here - but they concluded there wasnt enough evidence to prosecute.

It amounts to the same thing as far as I am concerned. The same thing. Practices taking place which if it were by 'British white man', they'd have no hesitation in pulling out all the stops to prosecute.

It's called being pathetically cowardly and allowing the tail to wag the dog.

you can bet your bottom dollar that there will be no action taken against this man - a white man with no previous convictions smacks his daughter for bad behaviour in a dentist, loses his job, and get thrown into jail for 6months.

I bet you don't see so much as a fine, neve mind a jail sentence for this evil old abusing bastard - never mind the hatred he is teaching towards Non Muslims (which given they all are living in a Non Muslim Country, is a bloody cheek).

[MTVN]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

It amounts to the same thing as far as I am concerned. The same thing. Practices taking place which if it were by 'British white man', they'd have no hesitation in pulling out all the stops to prosecute.

It's called being pathetically cowardly and allowing the tail to wag the dog.

you can bet your bottom dollar that there will be no action taken against this man - a white man with no previous convictions smacks his daughter for bad behaviour in a dentist, loses his job, and get thrown into jail for 6months.

I bet you don't see so much as a fine, neve mina a jail sentence for this evil old abusing bastard.

Well what about that documentary on the BNP a few years back? They tried to highlight the extremism of the party, just as Dispatches tried to highlight the extremism of the Mosques. Admittedly Griffin did get taken to court (maybe there was more evidence, I'm not sure) but he was found innocent. You seem to have a bit of a chip on your shoulder here.

You're still jumping to the conclusion that there will be no action taken with no real solid reason to do, other than your own suspicions. What evidence is there to suggest no action will be taken?