[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by Deep2

Maybe - but to claim she was as shallow and awful as Amy is dependent on many variables.

1) Did she have other pictures as well?
2) Was it a picture taken by big brother of her posing, or was it from home?
3) Was it as large as the one Amy has?

etc...the list goes on.

Perhaps most vitally, Rachel wasn't the brightest spark, but I don't think she was as blatantly shallow and self absorbed as Amy, hence a picture on the wall could mean many other things, based on her slightly more complex personality.

Amys one was not even large

[Deep2]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

Amys one was not even large

That's a ridiculous comment. What do you then define as large. 10cm by 10cm or 14.75 by 14.75? Suffice to say it was large enough for me to take notice of it. Further, it is not the size that is really the issue, but her shallow nature in puting this up in the first place, rather than something more sentimental or meaningful. It tells us she has little to go on except her physical attributes (which aren't fantastic anyway).

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Deep2

That's a ridiculous comment. What do you then define as large. 10cm by 10cm or 14.75 by 14.75? Suffice to say it was large enough for me to take notice of it. Further, it is not the size that is really the issue, but her shallow nature in puting this up in the first place, rather than something more sentimental or meaningful. It tells us she has little to go on except her physical attributes (which aren't fantastic anyway).

How does it tell us Sir?

[Deep2]

Originally Posted by parmnion

How does it tell us Sir?

As I would say if I was in the classroom, read the post again.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Deep2

As I would say if I was in the classroom, read the post again.

Maybe she doesn't feel the need to have family photo's around her while she works, and I don't recall her mentioning a dog or gerbil.

[Deep2]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Maybe she doesn't feel the need to have family photo's around her while she works, and I don't recall her mentioning a dog or gerbil.

Photo's ....real good English there. I suggest you re-read again my comments on what is says about her character. One doesn't need to have dogs and gerbils on the wall. You seem to need one on punctuation! She could have one in 'depth of character'

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Deep2

Photo's ....real good English there. I suggest you re-read again my comments on what is says about her character. One doesn't need to have dogs and gerbils on the wall. You seem to need one on punctuation! She could have one in 'depth of character'

Christ sake's, you're a ranty bugger are ye no.