[Beso]

Originally Posted by Deep2

That's a ridiculous comment. What do you then define as large. 10cm by 10cm or 14.75 by 14.75? Suffice to say it was large enough for me to take notice of it. Further, it is not the size that is really the issue, but her shallow nature in puting this up in the first place, rather than something more sentimental or meaningful. It tells us she has little to go on except her physical attributes (which aren't fantastic anyway).

How does it tell us Sir?

[Deep2]

Originally Posted by parmnion

How does it tell us Sir?

As I would say if I was in the classroom, read the post again.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Deep2

As I would say if I was in the classroom, read the post again.

Maybe she doesn't feel the need to have family photo's around her while she works, and I don't recall her mentioning a dog or gerbil.

[Deep2]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Maybe she doesn't feel the need to have family photo's around her while she works, and I don't recall her mentioning a dog or gerbil.

Photo's ....real good English there. I suggest you re-read again my comments on what is says about her character. One doesn't need to have dogs and gerbils on the wall. You seem to need one on punctuation! She could have one in 'depth of character'

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Deep2

Photo's ....real good English there. I suggest you re-read again my comments on what is says about her character. One doesn't need to have dogs and gerbils on the wall. You seem to need one on punctuation! She could have one in 'depth of character'

Christ sake's, you're a ranty bugger are ye no.