[In the Drunk Tank]

Originally Posted by lostalex

oic, "American Led", so what percentage of the killing of pakistani's is the UK responsible for? Since we're going to single each country in NATO out, how much of NATO is the UK, and how much blame does the UK take for this?

I'm interested in knowing.???

how exactly do we break down the responsiblity in percentages?

I'm just going by what it says in the article, and it's America who Pakistan have demanded leave an air base they have there.

But I see you missed my comment "I would condemn it which ever country led the attack", I don't support British involvement in NATO or in the many conflicts we get involved in, unlike you who blindly supports your country be they right or wrong

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by MTVN

I'm just going by what it says in the article, and it's America who Pakistan have demanded leave an air base they have there.

But I see you missed my comment "I would condemn it which ever country led the attack", I don't support British involvement in NATO or in the many conflicts we get involved in, unlike you who blindly supports your country be they right or wrong

I don't blindly support anything, and that was incredibly rude and condescending to say.

I certainly didn't support the Iraq war.

[In the Drunk Tank]

Originally Posted by lostalex

I don't blindly support anything, and that was incredibly rude and condescending to say.

I certainly didn't support the Iraq war.

Not as rude as you calling me an idiot in the other thread And I said that because you still don't seem to think America was really at fault here, you've tried blaming the Pakistanis for supposedly hiding Bin Laden and you've tried deflecting responsibility to NATO in general but still no word of condemnation

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Not as rude as you calling me an idiot in the other thread And I said that because you still don't seem to think America was really at fault here, you've tried blaming the Pakistanis for supposedly hiding Bin Laden and you've tried deflecting responsibility to NATO in general but still no word of condemnation

Amerivca is no more at fault than the Uk or Australia, funny i don't see you blaming Australia much for the Iraq war though, geee, i wonder why???

[In the Drunk Tank]

Originally Posted by lostalex

Amerivca is no more at fault than the Uk or Australia, funny i don't see you blaming Australia much for the Iraq war though, geee, i wonder why???

Because.. I'm Australian

You're being ridiculous, I was clearly referring specifically to this attack, which was American led whether you want to acknowledge it or not, if you want to talk about the Iraq war then I will condemn Britain, America, Australia, Spain, Italy and any other country that played any part in it

[lostalex]

Originally Posted by MTVN

Because.. I'm Australian

You're being ridiculous, I was clearly referring specifically to this attack, which was American led whether you want to acknowledge it or not, if you want to talk about the Iraq war then I will condemn Britain, America, Australia, Spain, Italy and any other country that played any part in it

and you don't find it at all odd, that when it's not America at fault, it's just called a NATO strike, but when America is involved it's called a "US LED" strike? you don't see how racist that is??? REALLY?

[In the Drunk Tank]

Originally Posted by lostalex

and you don't find it at all odd, that when it's not America at fault, it's just called a NATO strike, but when America is involved it's called a "US LED" strike? you don't see how racist that is??? REALLY?

Racist? It isn't racist. And this isn't something unique to America either, it was NATO who imposed a no-fly zone over Libya yet Britain and France were leading the attacks, and to a lesser extent America, so it was thought of as British/French led attacks, the same way this was an American led attack