[Kizzy]

What type of contract of employment do you have?...sounds well dodgy to me haha
I did not say you were dodgy did I?...Not sure why you found that rude.

Telling another person that they in dodgy employment is rude and offensive.
I didn't tell you anything though...don't misquote me.

That was a long time ago...
It is a long time since you were at school.Its a long time since I was at school ...I mentioned that too.

I happen to have studied when I was in my 20's, and into my 30's. With a a shorter study period in my 40's. You don't have to have to reflect on standards 30 years or so ago - learning doesn't stop for all after secondary school. It was a smart arse comment.
It was not...It is your choice to take it as such that was not the intention of the post

Do you work in the public sector?...Im guessing no.
Asking a question is not rude....

No it is not .... not allowing the person to answer, but chosing instead to be rudely presumptious - is rude, patronising and supercillious. You will not that YOU however have flatly refused to answer the same question posed to you (minus the sacarsm)
I allowed you to answer.... I had a guess as to the reply is all, its not rude

Why do people think teachers dont work in holiday times....haha its ridiculous
Making a statement is not rude.

You made no statement - you made a comment / preposed question - and one that again you do not allow the person to answer - instead - you very wrongly make an incorrect assumption and chose to mock them instead.
My statement was not aimed at anyone...you cannot mock someone who does not exist

Trying to discredit teachers by suggesting you could do a better job is ridiculous
Having an opinion is not rude.

No it is not. Misquoting and failing to quote what another person actually said - and twisting in around is however in an poor attempt to mock them however, is sanctimonous.
Sanctimonious....thats a new one,It was my opinion and not an attempted mocking.

If that is how you feel about those in public service in the UK today I feel very sorry for you. And I feel you are very out of touch in your responses
Again just my view..

No it is not. It's a personal snipe. If I had to say: I feel sorry for you because your posting style follows a pattern of repetitveness, is very restricted - and that I feel you too are out of touch on how to socially interract - that isn't just a view: would be offensive.
If you feel I have been rude, why respond with insults?...It makes no sense.

you might have a better view if you got off that tall horse....
I apologised for this comment once. I don't feel i need to again.

I didn't ask for another apology. You asked me for examples. I'm provided them to you so don't ask a question and then complain when you don't like the answer.
Ok

And with respect it takes a lot more than a paper qualification to be a teacher.
Another fact. Not in the slightest rude.

Actually it doesn't take more than paper qualifications in the true sense. That comment was on the back of a dig because I advised you that my qualifications allow me to teach. It was again sarcastically designed to be patronising.
Not at all, I stand by that comment...If you choose to take it out of the context it was intended I can not be held responsible

Have you spoken to any teachers regarding this drop in wages?....Im guessing no.

I find it hard to believe any teacher would welcome this, or agree with your view to be fair. Yet you say you have so I stand corrected...

Once again - you ask a question - don't allow the person to respond, instead opting to jump in there with sarcastic reply made by yourself... which was (for the umpeenth time that you've done it) - a very wrong assumption to make.
I allowed you to respond...I guessed at the reply, no sarcasm was intended

I don't think you have the first clue about teaching judging by this comment...
Another personal opinion, based on your reactions to my comments.

Rude and patronising. You once again jumped in with both feet and make so many wrong assumptions, proven by the last point above.
It is my opinion based on your posts, It is not an assumption, if you find views that don't agree with yours rude and patronising that is your issue not mine.


I am well aware of where the money comes from, please don't patronise me.
From what I can see this Is my reaction to your rudeness...

Given that you were asked time and time again on this particular matter of funding - and you blatantly ignored the questions (like all the others you were asked) - If you had simply answered (which by the way, you still haven't with any real effect), having to readdress the same question to you time and time again to no availl: shows that I believe you don't have a true picture overall.
Is this you trying to excuse your rudeness by suggesting you were exaperated by my continual evasion of your questioning?
I am not on trial and am not bound by law to answer your questioning...
It is astounding how you exhibit such double standards.... It seems you are quick to point fingers at the alleged rudness of others but not acknowledge your own.