[Nedusa]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

He likely would have indeed kazanne, they clearly succeeded in playing very heavily on that he hadn't meant to kill him.

For me, I wouldn't have cared about that, there was no need to humiliate the lad and have him strip then set him on fire,for me,I would have dismissed that argument of not meaning to kill him.

In my view he not only set out to greatly harm him, he also planned it too by humiliating him, this should have had him put away for decades and to be very strongly supervised too.
These crimes really get me angry when you see a sentence like this.

I totally agree with your post, too many times we have heard people escape serious prison sentences because they never set out to kill someone but the person dies or incurs serious injury from the perpetrator in any case. If you are of a disposition whereby you think it is acceptable to decide to pick on an innocent stranger and proceed to humiliate,torture,abuse and inflict bodily harm on that person then you have no place in a civilised society. Those actions are evil plain and simple and anyone who involves themselves in this type of activity in my book needs to be locked away for "life" or euthanized.

The defence of "I never meant to really harm him/her" is nonsense, once you decide to make that person a target for your evil actions you have crossed the line and whatever happens as a result is your fault and you should be treated accordingly. Society has no place for such evil murderous psychos...!!!