[Marcus.]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

sorry i mess up again
what is wrong with me

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Marcus.

sorry i mess up again
what is wrong with me

Dont worry about it, I like your typos

[Marcus.]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Dont worry about it, I like your typos

awww thanks
i sometimes get a really got post in my head then i forget to check my spellings

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Nope, you couldn't be further from the truth there vicky...
There may be some animosity on both sides but I am sur that they aare adult enough for it not to spill over.
If it did then I suppose there are no guarantees,what I am suggesting is guarded against is an out and out hounding.

I seriously doubt this would happen, and I think thinking this way is a little paranoid actually. If it did though obviously those involved would be punished.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

This is what happens already(well not bans, but infractions)..yet we still cant do right for doing wrong

I have said it before and I will say it again (and again and again no doubt) I much preferred the older system. I think infractions are useless tbh..until you have a considerable amount already, you get away with murder, while it appears others get punished more harshly because they already have a build up of points. One person could get 3 points and get nothing, the other person involved gets 3 points and it gives them a 2 week ban..then theres hell on about why one got banned and the other didnt. Its crap.

I know the ban system. but some members are talking like kate has to come back with her tail between here legs, but she owes no one nothing she has served her ban so lets drop it
but I wont have members thinking that she is on parole and if wind her up she will get banned again

if kate returns she is not on parole.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

I know the ban system. but some members are talking like kate has to come back with her tail between here legs, but she owes no one nothing she has served her ban so lets drop it
but I wont have members thinking that she is on parole and if wind her up she will get banned again

if kate returns she is not on parole.

Not one person has said anything even slightly like that

Infact, the person who brought up kates return in the first place was one of kates friends...and those who have problems with her have already said they will avoid her rather than taunt her.

[Vanessa]

I'm hoping we're all mature enough not to resort to mud slinging in here. Revenge will only make things worse.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Not one person has said anything even slightly like that

yes they have jesus saying she needs to be more humble

[Marcus.]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

I'm hoping we're all mature enough not to resort to mud slinging in here. Revenge will only make things worse.

aye ness
i do think the same

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

I know the ban system. but some members are talking like kate has to come back with her tail between here legs, but she owes no one nothing she has served her ban so lets drop it
but I wont have members thinking that she is on parole and if wind her up she will get banned again

if kate returns she is not on parole.

Anyone who's been given a lengthy ban is very much on parole Sheriff.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

yes they have jesus saying she needs to be more humble

Thats hardly saying she needs to come back with her tail between her legs now is it...

And (without starting a load of crap up) I really doubt kate gives a crap what jesus has to say about her anyway.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

This needs to be said and then I'm done. That same person you are getting butthurt about people being nasty too, before she's even returned and had to face a mythical TIBB gauntlet (way too dramatic), has been daubing the internet with continued snipes and gripes. Even today, so the question needs to be asked, can you not see the stark hypocrisy on display here?

Are you completely blind to what has been going on through all of Kates ban? Of course you're not, because you've been there for most of it, and read all of it. 90% of which we haven't even seen, so lets refrain from special pleading on her behalf already shall we?

I have no intention of having anything to do with her, and I think she'll treat me in the same way, but Kate needs to return in a far more humble manner than she left, and there really isn't any evidence of that being the case thus far.

Who knows what will happen? But lets avoid creating terrible situations in our minds, where people are all attacking Kate, and then asking the mods to do something about it before anything has even happened.

I do know yes, I also know you have taken exception to kate for whatever reason. She has no reason to be 'humble' she was banned and that ban is about to be lifted. The same rules then apply to her as you or I.
I appreciate nothing has happened, I am simply fearful it will is all.
I myself have had an awkward period of adjustment returning to the forum from an absence as you may be aware.
But I will see, my fears may be unwarranted, I hope they are.

But Niamh did not shoot the deputy.

[Lee.]

I don't have anything against Kate personally, but she's quite happily slagging tibb members off on her own forum so I think it's a bit much to ask everyone to welcome her back with open arms... Particularly those she's been taking the piss out of

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

Anyone who's been given a lengthy ban is very much on parole Sheriff.

well that's wrong! its a fresh start.
mods are not giving members the same rights as someone who has not been on a ban!

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Lee.

I don't have anything against Kate personally, but she's quite happily slagging tibb members off on her own forum so I think it's a bit much to ask everyone to welcome her back with open arms... Particularly those she's been taking the piss out of

[2]

Especially when you can see her coming back with a big thread acting the victim and then posting in the alcove and just taking swipes at other members

[Marcus.]

oh my fav thing a bout tibb was that as much as i do lots of spelling mistakes they don't give me bans for it

thank you mods and members

like other froum that has done that

[Drew.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

well that's wrong! its a fresh start.
mods are not giving members the same rights as someone who has not been on a ban!

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Lee.

I don't have anything against Kate personally, but she's quite happily slagging tibb members off on her own forum so I think it's a bit much to ask everyone to welcome her back with open arms... Particularly those she's been taking the piss out of

You do have a point and that is why i never go there.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Marcus.

oh my fav thing a bout tibb was that as much as i do lots of spelling mistakes they don't give me bans for it

thank you mods and members

Marcus your such a breath of fresh air

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

But Niamh did not shoot the deputy.

thanks for that just to let you know I don't believe in jesus!

[Wildcat!]

Originally Posted by Shaun

remember when this thread had one subject?

They straight up ignored you dude!!

[Marcus.]

oh i give up

see if i did that on other forums i would get banned

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

well that's wrong! its a fresh start.
mods are not giving members the same rights as someone who has not been on a ban!

Anyone who's been given a lengthy ban will be given an even longer ban if they carry on the same behaviour as before, I would have thought that makes alot of sense Sheriff.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I seriously doubt this would happen, and I think thinking this way is a little paranoid actually. If it did though obviously those involved would be punished.

Well not totally paranoid, as I have just returned from a short period away from the forum and I was subjected to a few glib comments vicky, so my thinking is not totally unfounded.