[Vicky.]

So no posters have said that then? Thats what I was asking.

And the problem is much more likely to be males not wanting to teach primary school kids, than women being favoured tbh. As I said earlier, schools are crying out for ANY teachers, so doubt blokes are being passed up.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

So no posters have said that then? Thats what I was asking.

And the problem is much more likely to be males not wanting to teach primary school kids, than women being favoured tbh. As I said earlier, schools are crying out for ANY teachers, so doubt blokes are being passed up.

you have zero evidence to back that up. I have the facts 2% and 12% these are the facts. do you think those figures are acceptable? what do you think can be done to improve those figures? Ive made umpteen suggestions, such as changing the environment to suit males too, positive discrimination too....there are also clearly paranoias against men....the double CRB checks should be plenty for them to know if a man has a dodgy past too...feminists fight for getting more oney in all areas they are under represented...shouldn't the same be done for men under represented too? isn't that fair? shouldn't the eqiual opportunity people fight for that too?
ps Ive been accused of being a potential murdrer of women and prostitutes, why haven't you found it in you to be offended by that and told off the poster? or do you pick and choose what you decide to be offended by according to your own agenda? sounds hypocritical and biased much like the feminazi agenda and the couldn't care less attitude about male teachers and role models

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by the truth

you have zero evidence to back that up. I have the facts 2% and 12% these are the facts. do you think those figures are acceptable? what do you think can be done to improve those figures? Ive made umpteen suggestions, such as changing the environment to suit males too, positive discrimination too....there are also clearly paranoias against men....the double CRB checks should be plenty for them to know if a man has a dodgy past too...feminists fight for getting more oney in all areas they are under represented...shouldn't the same be done for men under represented too? isn't that fair? shouldn't the eqiual opportunity people fight for that too?
ps Ive been accused of being a potential murdrer of women and prostitutes, why haven't you found it in you to be offended by that and told off the poster? or do you pick and choose what you decide to be offended by according to your own agenda? sounds hypocritical and biased much like the feminazi agenda and the couldn't care less attitude about male teachers and role models

I have as much evidence to back that up as you do for your theory about it being all about crazy feminists and discrimination.

I don't think much an be done to improve those figures, as my theory is that most men just dont WANT to teach younger kids. The fact that the gender balance becomes more balanced as ages of kids goes up kinda backs that up. Short of picking a few thousand men at random each year and forcing them to get their teaching qualification, then forcing them to teach primary school kids(which would be very wrong), nothing can be done IMO.

Also I'm not offended by anything you have written. Not sure why you would think that.

And tbh I am probably about as far from a 'feminist' (at least your meaning of it) as you can get

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I have as much evidence to back that up as you do for your theory about it being all about crazy feminists and discrimination.

I don't think much an be done to improve those figures, as my theory is that most men just dont WANT to teach younger kids. The fact that the gender balance becomes more balanced as ages of kids goes up kinda backs that up. Short of picking a few thousand men at random each year and forcing them to get their teaching qualification, then forcing them to teach primary school kids(which would be very wrong), nothing can be done IMO.

Also I'm not offended by anything you have written. Not sure why you would think that.

And tbh I am probably about as far from a 'feminist' (at least your meaning of it) as you can get

I have facts you have baseless theories....why don't you care about this and why cant you think of anything to be done to improve it? youd no doubt care about women under represented and demand action to improve it...as do the feminists....yet not when men are under represented..double standards.
why do u suggest the only option is for men get forced into the job , what utter nonsense......are you also saying the Only way to get women into parliament is to force them with a pitchfork. nonsense. they fight to change the environment to encourage women and they have women only short lists...why don you and the feminists fight for the same for men under represented to an even greater degree? if not why not? anything less is feminist hypocrisy and exposes their agenda as biased and selfish