[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by the truth

you have zero evidence to back that up. I have the facts 2% and 12% these are the facts. do you think those figures are acceptable? what do you think can be done to improve those figures? Ive made umpteen suggestions, such as changing the environment to suit males too, positive discrimination too....there are also clearly paranoias against men....the double CRB checks should be plenty for them to know if a man has a dodgy past too...feminists fight for getting more oney in all areas they are under represented...shouldn't the same be done for men under represented too? isn't that fair? shouldn't the eqiual opportunity people fight for that too?
ps Ive been accused of being a potential murdrer of women and prostitutes, why haven't you found it in you to be offended by that and told off the poster? or do you pick and choose what you decide to be offended by according to your own agenda? sounds hypocritical and biased much like the feminazi agenda and the couldn't care less attitude about male teachers and role models

I have as much evidence to back that up as you do for your theory about it being all about crazy feminists and discrimination.

I don't think much an be done to improve those figures, as my theory is that most men just dont WANT to teach younger kids. The fact that the gender balance becomes more balanced as ages of kids goes up kinda backs that up. Short of picking a few thousand men at random each year and forcing them to get their teaching qualification, then forcing them to teach primary school kids(which would be very wrong), nothing can be done IMO.

Also I'm not offended by anything you have written. Not sure why you would think that.

And tbh I am probably about as far from a 'feminist' (at least your meaning of it) as you can get