Quote:
Originally Posted by MTVN
Agree, think this posts sums up why rape/sexual assault is such an inherently difficult case to decide upon, it would be a massive mistake to presume that because there wasn't enough evidence to convict someone then by necessity the accusers were lying
|
I was suggesting that false accusers should be prosecuted if there is clear evidence to say they were lying, not that there might be a little evidence. Unless it's okay for innocent men to pay the price because some rape victims are not believed. Sounds a little one-sided to me. Justice for everyone, isn't that what it's all about?
Threaded Mode