[reality]

I admit that I might be biased because I much prefer Katie Hopkins (something I never thought I would say) to Perez because her version of entertaining at least shows a level of intelligence and wit, although she can go too far sometimes.
Lets be honest though, neither of them have behaved perfectly, and we wouldn't want them to, but it frustrates me when people dress up Perez's behaviour as though he's some kind of martyr.
They have both dished it out, and they are both getting it back to a certain extent. I think the fact the Katie is only abusive to him is 6 of one and half a dozen of the other, you could see it as bullying one person, or you could look at it from the viewpoint that he has wound up and goaded everybody (apart from one person).
The main thing that I'm trying to say is, biases aside; Katie Hopkins hasn't had people walk from the house as a consequence of her actions. And even more importantly; Katie isn't being given the option of a vote for immunity, only Perez is being granted that privilege. Even if it was somebody I liked being given that option, I still wouldn't agree with it.
I don't necessarily want Perez to go yet, but I think that we should be given the option of whether or not to save him when he is up for eviction. BB have already protected him from this round of nominations. I'm starting to suspect that "making the final/winning" was signed into his contract based on the obvious preferential treatment he has received from BB.