[user104658]

Yes Charles! Who are these primitive louts, stoning wives to death for adultery?? You can't just go and stone someone to death! You have to follow the Great British example, and hire some motorcycle-riding hitmen to chase that bitch down and force her car off the road at high speed in a tunnel.

It's just manners.

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Yes Charles! Who are these primitive louts, stoning their wives to death for adultery?? You can't just go and stone someone to death! You have to follow his Great British example, and hire some motorcycle-riding hitmen to chase that butch down and force her car off the road at high speed in a tunnel.

It's just manners.

That's a different subject altogether, and it's not 100% proven.

But I agree with what you're saying in principle as off the record we all know what happened.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

That's a different subject altogether, and it's not 100% proven.

But I agree with what you're saying in principle as off the record we all know what happened.

It's sort of a different topic, but not really. I'm suggesting that Charles might want to steer clear of moral crusades and go back to his rightful place as a mute tourist attraction. He's always been a bit too involved politically. One wonders if he has some delusion that hereditary rule should still be in place...

It's all especially questionable given that his wife's untimely demise was essentially caused by certain figures who were in a blind panic that good ol' King William and Prince Harry might - horror of horrors - end up with a "half-muslim sibling". True story.

[jennyjuniper]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

That's a different subject altogether, and it's not 100% proven.

But I agree with what you're saying in principle as off the record we all know what happened.

Do we? If you hire investigate journalists or 'experts' they can prove whatever point you want them to prove. One point to remember no-one forced Diana NOT to wear her seat belt. If she had, although perhaps badly injured, she would maybe not have died.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Yes Charles! Who are these primitive louts, stoning their wives to death for adultery?? You can't just go and stone someone to death! You have to follow his Great British example, and hire some motorcycle-riding hitmen to chase that bitch down and force her car off the road at high speed in a tunnel.

It's just manners.

Its a sadly contradictory world.

Thanks ToySoldier, your post made me laugh.

[ChristmasNeeve]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Yes Charles! Who are these primitive louts, stoning their wives to death for adultery?? You can't just go and stone someone to death! You have to follow his Great British example, and hire some motorcycle-riding hitmen to chase that bitch down and force her car off the road at high speed in a tunnel.

It's just manners.

[Helen 28]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Yes Charles! Who are these primitive louts, stoning their wives to death for adultery?? You can't just go and stone someone to death! You have to follow his Great British example, and hire some motorcycle-riding hitmen to chase that bitch down and force her car off the road at high speed in a tunnel.

It's just manners.

You want to be very careful accusing a member of the Royal Family of arranging a murder, you do realise that everything you put on here is classed as publishing the same as writing a book.

I'm very surprised your accusation hasn't been removed.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Helen 28

You want to be very careful accusing a member of the Royal Family of arranging a murder, you do realise that everything you put on here is classed as publicising the same as writing a book.

I'm very surprised your accusation hasn't been removed.

I'm surprised it hasn't been removed, too. Especially considering that countless documentaries and pieces of evidence, witness statements and court documents on the subject are constantly being "cleaned" from the Internet in order to keep the UK in our nice little bubble of censorship surrounding the Diana issue.

The inconsistencies surrounding her death are pretty well established and understood in other countries. What I said is hardly radical. However, I have slightly altered the post, as it was wrong of me to intimate that Charles would have been involved directly, rather than pointing to the fact that it was most likely certain other entities in royal / political circles. I have changed one word.