[billy123]

Originally Posted by Livia

Unlawfully hacking is neither moral nor ethical and it is against the law. Great if they expose paedophiles... not so great if they expose someone who's innocent. They're not going to build a case on evidence, are they. I'm sure everyone's going to applaud what they're doing - this time. Until a paediatrician gets beaten to death by an angry mob or some similar travesty of justice.

These aren't ethical, moral fighters for the truth, they're a bunch of geeks who name their operations after Harry Potter characters.

I feel it's a stretch to assume that everyone who works in the law is working hard to protect paedophiles when the reverse is true. There is nowhere to hide for these people now and I'm glad. But we don't need amateurs outing who they consider guilty and thus jeopardising any case that might be brought against them.

You simply fail to understand that these people (call them what you want to demean them its cheap and easy) are not going to convict they will simply lay evidence of paedophilia on the table. What the law does with that evidence is up to them.
When your average joe can find evidence of people touching kids that the law have failed to look at then it becomes an ethical and moral responsibility to put it on the table.
Protecting kiddy fiddlers isnt something to be proud of.