[Nedusa]

Originally Posted by bobnot

You simply fail to understand that these people (call them what you want to demean them its cheap and easy) are not going to convict they will simply lay evidence of paedophilia on the table. What the law does with that evidence is up to them.
When your average joe can find evidence of people touching kids that the law have failed to look at then it becomes an ethical and moral responsibility to put it on the table.
Protecting a kiddy fiddler isnt something to be proud of.

But the problem then would be if the Govt is protecting Kiddy Fiddlers to use your phrase and this group finds evidence that the Govt agencies couldn't find or decided not to find, the people implicated will face trial by Media not law. and then we are back into the same grey area as before.

Without the full weight of the law backing this group or investigating their findings, their findings alone will not be proof af anything and will not be taken seriously.

Also in the time these findings are made before any official investigation can start the groups or individuals implicated will be furiously covering their tracks and destroying all/any evidence or trails.

The bigger scandal in this if proved true is the fact that wealthy privileged people can bend the law to suit their own evil habits.





.