[Richkingretro]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Stop right there.

Who's made a "sexist judgement"?

You said you would judge Sarah on such a action if you see your earlier post.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Richkingretro

You said you would judge Sarah on such a action if you see your earlier post.

I also said I'd judge ANY housemate for having sex and have judged housemates in the past for doing so.

I'll ask again, how is this sexist?

[joeysteele]

I don't really think much of her already anyway so that would be just about the limit for me as to her.

[Richkingretro]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I also said I'd judge ANY housemate for having sex and have judged housemates in the past for doing so.

I'll ask again, how is this sexist?

Well the context of the thread is people making sexist judgements on attractive females i.e Sarah if they have sex in the house. If your saying you would judge both male and female having sex equally then of course the charge of sexism does not apply to you if your being honest. However I still feel it's a prudish judgment but I respect you might have different boundaries to me.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Richkingretro

Well the context of the thread is people making sexist judgements on attractive females i.e Sarah if they have sex in the house. If your saying you would judge both male and female having sex equally then of course the charge of sexism does not apply to you if your being honest. However I still feel it's a prudish judgment but I respect you might have different boundaries to me.

I don't think it's prudish at all. And I doubt anyone who's spoken to me on this forum would think of me of all people as a prude.

Sex on TV makes them classless. It's not something that makes me break out in hives, throw holy water on the TV and cry myself to sleep. Just something I find cheap, crass and a low thing to do.

Just as I've found a multitude of other things housemates do reduces my opinion of them. Just as in real life. If my friend went upstairs for a shag in the bedroom, fair enough. If he insisted on shagging in the middle of the room during a party I'd think less of them.

[Richkingretro]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

I don't think it's prudish at all. And I doubt anyone who's spoken to me on this forum would think of me of all people as a prude.

Sex on TV makes them classless. It's not something that makes me break out in hives, throw holy water on the TV and cry myself to sleep. Just something I find cheap, crass and a low thing to do.

Ok then we will just have to disagree on this matter as I think someone expressing themselves physically with another human being natural and normal. Yes it's on TV but they agreed to expose themselves as people on a TV show and you signed up to voyeuristically watch them do so. If your red line is sex then fine but I don't find that any less classless than for example the twins getting drunk or any of the other emotional outbursts from the housemates. It's just people being people to me.

[Marsh.]

1) Two human beings getting intimate is normal. I never said any different.

2) I didn't sign up for anything.

3) This thread is so pretentious I'm now done.

[Beetlejuice]

Originally Posted by Richkingretro

Ok then we will just have to disagree on this matter as I think someone expressing themselves physically with another human being natural and normal. Yes it's on TV but they agreed to expose themselves as people on a TV show and you signed up to voyeuristically watch them do so. If your red line is sex then fine but I don't find that any less classless than for example the twins getting drunk or any of the other emotional outbursts from the housemates. It's just people being people to me.

It's shameless people being shameless people.

[Richkingretro]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

1) Two human beings getting intimate is normal. I never said any different.

2) I didn't sign up for anything.

3) This thread is so pretentious I'm now done.

1) You said if two people in the house had sex you would make a judgement on them as being 'classless'. Debasing people based on the most natural of acts is not exactly accepting that as normal.

2) Signing up is just an expression of commitment. You watch the show and post long replies on a forum about the show. To me that's pretty committed by most standards.

3) If anything it is yourself who has made an over the top defence of your view that a natural act taking place would be 'classless' which to me is pretentious. My whole point is someone should not be vilified because of this especially a female.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Richkingretro

1) You said if two people in the house had sex you would make a judgement on them as being 'classless'. Debasing people based on the most natural of acts is not exactly accepting that as normal.

2) Signing up is just an expression of commitment. You watch the show and post long replies on a forum about the show. To me that's pretty committed by most standards.

3) If anything it is yourself who has made an over the top defence of your view that a natural act taking place would be 'classless' which to me is pretentious. My whole point is someone should not be vilified because of this especially a female.

Why, "especially a female", how sexist of you.

Also, for the 10000th time, I am not judging them for having sex and committing a natural act. I would be judging them for DOING IT ON TELEVISION.

I haven't made "long replies" in regards to the events for this show for a couple of years.

[YourLAEx]

I bet all the men have had a wank. It's natural. If Sarah wants to let a penis in her pussycat then let her.

[Richkingretro]

Originally Posted by YourLAEx

I bet all the men have had a wank. It's natural. If Sarah wants to let a penis in her pussycat then let her.

Well said, there should be equal rights for women with out fear of discrimination or judgement.

[Marsh.]

There hasn't been any discrimination. Sarah hasn't even had sex in the house.

What a pointless and stupid thread.

[Richkingretro]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

There hasn't been any discrimination. Sarah hasn't even had sex in the house.

What a pointless and stupid thread.

It's obviously hypothetical but it's been interesting to read people's view points. You seem to have made enough comments in it for some who thinks the thread is stupid and pretentious but then again the apple rarely falls far from the tree.

[Johnnyuk123]

No... Sarah having sex in the house would not change my opinion of her being a pointless housemate.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Yes. I judge anyone for having sex on television.

^

Nothing more vile than 'open it II'

[Nancy.]

I never thought much of her to begin with so I doubt being bonked by someone in the house will change that.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Richkingretro

It's obviously hypothetical but it's been interesting to read people's view points. You seem to have made enough comments in it for some who thinks the thread is stupid and pretentious but then again the apple rarely falls far from the tree.

Would you like to repeat that in english?

[billy123]

Originally Posted by Maria26

Cheap? prostitute? Please....

How many people over the years have had sex in the house? Hating on them for that simple reason just makes you a fool and a disgusting prick....you don't hate people for having sex, especially has you don't see anything graphic.

They are in the house to be judged by the public and they will be judged by the things they say and do. Shagging in the house is a desperate move you can see why it wouldnt reflect well with the public.