[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Firegazer

She didn't take it out of the prize fund, it was offered to her. Her problem is with people taking things out of the prize fund, which she did not do. So no, she is not a hypocrite.

She had the option of adding to the fund or taking for herself, she chose to take it for herself. The only way her excuse works is if the money they had lost had been replaced already...and the 5k would be surplus to the prize fund

[Ashley.]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

She had the option of adding to the fund or taking for herself, she chose to take it for herself. The only way her excuse works is if the money they had lost had been replaced already...and the 5k would be surplus to the prize fund

But at that moment in time, the money was not part of the prize fund. So it was fair game.

Why should she lose out on £5k just to reverse other housemates' mistakes? (Joel/Nick/Talkers)

[Pete.]

Originally Posted by Firegazer

But at that moment in time, the money was not part of the prize fund. So it was fair game.

Why should she lose out on £5k just to reverse other housemates' mistakes? (Joel/Nick/Talkers)

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Firegazer

But at that moment in time, the money was not part of the prize fund. So it was fair game.

Why should she lose out on £5k just to reverse other housemates' mistakes? (Joel/Nick/Talkers)

She was one of the talkers...

Anyway, I don't begrudge her taking it, I would too, same as I would have dropped my bag for food and offered cash for other stuff. The problem is the hypocrisy about it all. She would have went ****ing MENTAL had she not took the 5k and someone else had. Hell she had a **** fit about 100 quid..