[Withano]

Originally Posted by JamesBond

He was the show,

Agree with that much and he was ****. Fun for a week, repetitive and boring from there on out.

[JamesBond]

Originally Posted by Withano

Agree with that much and he was ****. Fun for a week, repetitive and boring from there on out.

That didn't answer my question.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by JamesBond

That didn't answer my question.

Do you understand what detrimental means?

Would you understand what would happen to something bad if you removed the detrimental attribute.

Your question was answered, your comprehension let you down, perhaps.

[JamesBond]

Originally Posted by Withano

Do you understand what detrimental means?

Would you understand what would happen to something bad if you removed the detrimental attribute.

Your question was answered, your comprehension let you down, perhaps.

My question was -

Give specific examples on how its improved?

To which you replied -

Agree with that much and he was ****. Fun for a week, repetitive and boring from there on out.

It was answered incorrectly, maybe not reading it let you down.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by JamesBond

My question was -

Give specific examples on how its improved?

It was answer incorrectly, maybe not reading it let you down.

Specific example #1 The main detrimental attribute to the show was evicted due to popular demand

Hope that helps bae

[JamesBond]

Originally Posted by Withano

Specific example #1 The main detrimental attribute to the show was evicted due to popular demand

Hope that helps bae

Wow you did the same thing again ?

Omg

[Withano]

Originally Posted by JamesBond

Wow you did the same thing again ?

Omg

Do you understand what detrimental means? Removing a detrimental attribute makes it greater. You originally asked a question on a post with the answer inside of it, I've ran out of ways to reword the answer to help you understand, sorry.

[spot_on]

Originally Posted by Withano

Specific example #1 The main detrimental attribute to the show was evicted due to popular demand

Hope that helps bae

He was evicted because it was a vote to evict, not save. Bitter and jealous fans of the boring drones wanted Marc out because he was getting air time (and rightfully so). They teamed up together because they knew their housemate had no chance to win over Marc.

Imagine if you were the producer of the show and you had your choice of Joel pretending he is morally superior, Harry who is depressing, Nick who follows around a stripper like a puppy dog, Danny and Cristian who have personalities of a vanilla wafer, "woe is me" Chloe, or an entertaining bloke like Marc? Can you blame them for focusing on Marc?

I actually feel sorry for the producers of the show right now, putting together an entertaining hour with these housemates must be like getting you fingernails pulled.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by spot_on

He was evicted because it was a vote to evict, not save. Bitter and jealous fans of the boring drones wanted Marc out because he was getting air time (and rightfully so). They teamed up together because they knew their housemate had no chance to win over Marc.

Imagine if you were the producer of the show and you had your choice of Joel pretending he is morally superior, Harry who is depressing, Nick who follows around a stripper like a puppy dog, Danny and Cristian who have personalities of a vanilla wafer, "woe is me" Chloe, or an entertaining bloke like Marc? Can you blame them for focusing on Marc?

I actually feel sorry for the producers of the show right now, putting together an entertaining hour with these housemates must be like getting you fingernails pulled.

Entertaining in your opinion.. a lot of people would disagree, the producers could have easily frozen the lines and reopened the lines between Marc and Harry if they wanted to save Marc but they didn't. Because they know he's nowhere near as popular or valuable as you think he is inside your own mind