|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Out here in the perimeter
Posts: 10,448
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Out here in the perimeter
Posts: 10,448
|
What if the Japanese had launched a nuclear attack on New York and Los Angeles. Would it still have been the best thing to do to save lives in the long run? Listing Japanese war crimes is fine but the US weren't exactly angels.
I always find the "it was for the best" argument really weird and ill thought out.
Last edited by billy123; 13-08-2015 at 10:58 PM.
|
13-08-2015, 10:50 PM
Reply With Quote
Threaded Mode