Home Menu

Site Navigation


Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 14-08-2015, 08:54 AM #11
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
user104658 user104658 is offline
-
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 36,685
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Livia View Post
Once again... let's see your list of Allied war crimes against the Japanese record. Your view that the dropping of the bomb was an act of terrorismis a fresh and slightly skewed one . Do you think that the bombing of Pearl Harbour was an act of terrorism? Just because someone hits a bully with a stick bigger than the one that the bully has, doesn't make them a bully too.

Most of the British soldiers that died at the hands of the Japanese - tortured to death (think about that for a minute...) starved to death, beaten to death... their stories have passed and now we can truly view the Japanese as the victims. And that's what's happening. Had the Japanese had nuclear weapons they would have used them. We all know that whether we deny it or not. The people who made the decision to drop the bomb used their best judgement at the time after six years of world war. Now people who've never been involved in a conflict are judging them to be cowards.

Do I think the Americans would make the same decision now? Not at all. To quote L. P. Hartley in The Go-Between: The past is a foreign country, they do things differently there.
I don't have a "list" but the notion that not one Allied sodier was guilty of war crimes in WW2 is frankly absurd. I haven't once passed comment on the scale; I am well aware that the brutality of and crimes committed by both the Japanese and German forces in WW2 far outweigh anything from "our side", including dropping the bombs, but I don't really find the scale to be relevant when giving a flat description of what happened. I guess in much the same was that mass-murder doesn't mean shoplifting "isn't a crime", even though you can hardly compare the two?

As for the description of terrorism - I know that it's not even within the bounds of what constitutes terrorism in law... however, it was; "a use of force against a civilian population with the sole purpose of creating fear in order to achieve an idea (stopping the war)". It certainly, at least, has a lot in common with terrorism. Whether or not it was a JUSTIFIED use of terror is another discussion entirely.
user104658 is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
1945, cowards, japan, nuked, usa


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts