[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

They are'nt seperate issues?Corbyn would more than likely love to sit down with ISIS and have a good old chin wagg.Unfortunately by doing so he would
A) Get nowhere
And
B) Show the world that terrorism gets you a platform to air your warped views

The only course of action against these terrorists is to destroy them or to weaken them into submission.However long it takes.It is a war that they started and they must face the consequences.

They are separate as Corbyn hasn't attempted to talk with ISIS either....

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

They are separate as Corbyn hasn't attempted to talk with ISIS either....

I never said he did.
He would if he got the chance though........

And he would fail and he would be legitimising their actions.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

I never said he did.
He would if he got the chance though........

And he would fail and he would be legitimising their actions.

And I never suggested you did, the thread has diverged into two however the ISIS threat and the unrelated discussions had by Mr Corbyn with other bodies. That's some supposition there NM.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

And I never suggested you did, the thread has diverged into two however the ISIS threat and the unrelated discussions had by Mr Corbyn with other bodies. That's some supposition there NM.

The suggestion that Corbyn thinks that Jihadi John should have been arrested rather than killed was not brought up by me first but was totally related to the thread title.You are talking about Corbyns terrorist sympathies.You raise a good point though.Corbyn would more than likely relish the chance of tea and Digestives with ISIS.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

The suggestion that Corbyn thinks that Jihadi John should have been arrested rather than killed was not brought up by me first but was totally related to the thread title.You are talking about Corbyns terrorist sympathies.You raise a good point though.Corbyn would more than likely relish the chance of tea and Digestives with ISIS.

I didn't raise the point of Corbyn speaking with ISIS...you did.
What is wrong with suggesting he was arrested, could it have prevented possible revenge attacks? We have yet to see.
I am not talking about Corbyns terrorist sympathies at all I have expanded on the points raised relating to his past meetings in the spirit of peace and diplomacy ... again none of which were with ISIS.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I didn't raise the point of Corbyn speaking with ISIS...you did.
What is wrong with suggesting he was arrested, could it have prevented possible revenge attacks? We have yet to see.
I am not talking about Corbyns terrorist sympathies at all I have expanded on the points raised relating to his past meetings in the spirit of peace and diplomacy ... again none of which were with ISIS.

Well what point were you raising and what exactly did it have to do with Jihadi John?I assumed you were talking about ISIS since that is what we're discussing here is'nt it?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

Well what point were you raising and what exactly did it have to do with Jihadi John?I assumed you were talking about ISIS since that is what we're discussing here is'nt it?

I am raising the issue that Corbyn and Corbyn supporters increasingly seem to be accused of sympathising with ISIS.
What purpose did killing him serve? A captive terrorist is a contained powder keg.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

The suggestion that Corbyn thinks that Jihadi John should have been arrested rather than killed was not brought up by me first but was totally related to the thread title.You are talking about Corbyns terrorist sympathies.You raise a good point though.Corbyn would more than likely relish the chance of tea and Digestives with ISIS.

And - once again - How correct you are Paul.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

They are separate as Corbyn hasn't attempted to talk with ISIS either....

.... and would not either Kizzy.
Sadly we have to just accept these unfounded in the main slurs are going to keep coming at him.

That is not to say he would not support as other leaders should, any efforts to assist other Nations to try to find some one that could intermediate between them hoping to find some way of breaking down those awful organisation.

It does seem at present the only hope the world has is that this vile organisation turns on itself and breaks itself down.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

.... and would not either Kizzy.
Sadly we have to just accept these unfounded in the main slurs are going to keep coming at him.

That is not to say he would not support as other leaders should, any efforts to assist other Nations to try to find some one that could intermediate between them hoping to find some way of breaking down those awful organisation.

It does seem at present the only hope the world has is that this vile organisation turns on itself and breaks itself down.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I was given some better hope on QT on Thursday where a fair number in the audience thought the attacks on Corbyn was pathetic.

The Sun's representative got a very rough ride as to it.

Also he did say he sort of wished this individual Jihadi John ad been captured and today I have been amazed at how many agree in principle with that, and not only Labour supporters either.