[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

And I never suggested you did, the thread has diverged into two however the ISIS threat and the unrelated discussions had by Mr Corbyn with other bodies. That's some supposition there NM.

The suggestion that Corbyn thinks that Jihadi John should have been arrested rather than killed was not brought up by me first but was totally related to the thread title.You are talking about Corbyns terrorist sympathies.You raise a good point though.Corbyn would more than likely relish the chance of tea and Digestives with ISIS.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

The suggestion that Corbyn thinks that Jihadi John should have been arrested rather than killed was not brought up by me first but was totally related to the thread title.You are talking about Corbyns terrorist sympathies.You raise a good point though.Corbyn would more than likely relish the chance of tea and Digestives with ISIS.

I didn't raise the point of Corbyn speaking with ISIS...you did.
What is wrong with suggesting he was arrested, could it have prevented possible revenge attacks? We have yet to see.
I am not talking about Corbyns terrorist sympathies at all I have expanded on the points raised relating to his past meetings in the spirit of peace and diplomacy ... again none of which were with ISIS.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I didn't raise the point of Corbyn speaking with ISIS...you did.
What is wrong with suggesting he was arrested, could it have prevented possible revenge attacks? We have yet to see.
I am not talking about Corbyns terrorist sympathies at all I have expanded on the points raised relating to his past meetings in the spirit of peace and diplomacy ... again none of which were with ISIS.

Well what point were you raising and what exactly did it have to do with Jihadi John?I assumed you were talking about ISIS since that is what we're discussing here is'nt it?

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

Well what point were you raising and what exactly did it have to do with Jihadi John?I assumed you were talking about ISIS since that is what we're discussing here is'nt it?

I am raising the issue that Corbyn and Corbyn supporters increasingly seem to be accused of sympathising with ISIS.
What purpose did killing him serve? A captive terrorist is a contained powder keg.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I am raising the issue that Corbyn and Corbyn supporters increasingly seem to be accused of sympathising with ISIS.
What purpose did killing him serve? A captive terrorist is a contained powder keg.

Well i do not think Corbyn supporters sympathise with ISIS.Well maybe some do but as a whole i'd say not.Corbyn on the other hand i'm not so sure.

As for killing Jihadi John.He was taken out in the most efficient way possible without any American soldiers dying in the process.My point that i raised earlier was that if Corbyn had his way and was in control of the military he would risk the lives of soldiers needlessly in order to get Jihadi John into a courtroom.That alone imo makes him unfit to lead a country and its armed forces.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

Well i do not think Corbyn supporters sympathise with ISIS.Well maybe some do but as a whole i'd say not.Corbyn on the other hand i'm not so sure.

As for killing Jihadi John.He was taken out in the most efficient way possible without any American soldiers dying in the process.My point that i raised earlier was that if Corbyn had his way and was in control of the military he would risk the lives of soldiers needlessly in order to get Jihadi John into a courtroom.That alone imo makes him unfit to lead a country and its armed forces.

You are welcome to think that, my feeling is that by killing him we have sealed our fate as a direct target.
It may have been seen as unavoidable but personally I think it was a mistake.
Not getting him in a courtroom could have already cost over 100 innocent French people their lives.

[Northern Monkey]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

You are welcome to think that, my feeling is that by killing him we have sealed our fate as a direct target.
It may have been seen as unavoidable but personally I think it was a mistake.
Not getting him in a courtroom could have already cost over 100 innocent French people their lives.

My personal feeling is that the Paris attack would have happened anyway.If it was revenge for Jihadi John it seems very quick off the mark.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

The suggestion that Corbyn thinks that Jihadi John should have been arrested rather than killed was not brought up by me first but was totally related to the thread title.You are talking about Corbyns terrorist sympathies.You raise a good point though.Corbyn would more than likely relish the chance of tea and Digestives with ISIS.

And - once again - How correct you are Paul.