[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

Ahhh, if only Interpol was in possession of the facts like people on this forum, eh? If only they were more intelligent... Maybe some of the people on here with such concrete proof will feel duty bound to share that information with Interpol... because it seems they don't know.

One would assume, as with the regular police, Interpol have to follow up on any alleged sighting as a matter of course. Could it be Maddie? Is it within the realms of physical possibility? Sure. If it actually is, though, I will buy a hat, and post a video of myself literally eating it.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

One would assume, as with the regular police, Interpol have to follow up on any alleged sighting as a matter of course. Could it be Maddie? Is it within the realms of physical possibility? Sure. If it actually is, though, I will buy a hat, and post a video of myself literally eating it.

If the police had the evidence that I've seen people on this forum quote as being actualy evidence, then they'd save themselves a lot of time.

THAT'S what I meant.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Livia

If the police had the evidence that I've seen people on this forum quote as being actualy evidence, then they'd save themselves a lot of time.

For some reason or other, casual opinion isn't usually under the same constraints as official police investigations or criminal trials. I for one am quite thankful for that, because I'd find it horrendously boring to have to constantly hold the default position of "I don't know or have any opinion of any kind because thats for th'law to decide and once those people officially decide what the truth is then I can read about it and then I will know "

[Livia]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

For some reason or other, casual opinion isn't usually under the same constraints as official police investigations or criminal trials. I for one am quite thankful for that, because I'd find it horrendously boring to have to constantly hold the default position of "I don't know or have any opinion of any kind because thats for th'law to decide and once those people officially decide what the truth is then I can read about it and then I will know "

My take on it is this: if there is evidence, present it. if their is not... maybe you've got the wrong end of the stick.

:-)

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Livia

My take on it is this: if there is evidence, present it. if their is not... maybe you've got the wrong end of the stick.

:-)

Fair enough, but the little problem of there not being evidence to suggest ANY theory in this case is the slight problem with this. So even those who believe kates claim of abduction should not discuss the case, as there is no evidence for that line of thinking either, besides the word of the parents, who in other cases would be the prime suspects to the majority

Its not as if those who believe something more sinister went on are just ignoring all real evidence or anything, like 911 truthers and that

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Fair enough, but the little problem of there not being evidence to suggest ANY theory in this case is the slight problem with this. So even those who believe kates claim of abduction should not discuss the case, as there is no evidence for that line of thinking either, besides the word of the parents, who in other cases would be the prime suspects to the majority

Its not as if those who believe something more sinister went on are just ignoring all real evidence or anything, like 911 truthers and that

This. There is no evidence to back up the abduction theeory so why arent people allowed to speculate?

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

One would assume, as with the regular police, Interpol have to follow up on any alleged sighting as a matter of course. Could it be Maddie? Is it within the realms of physical possibility? Sure. If it actually is, though, I will buy a hat, and post a video of myself literally eating it.

Youtube video