[Ithinkiloveyoutoo]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

It's good but it's very biased towards Steve Avery being innocent, I think after watching you need to read up a bit yourself too. After watching Making a Murder I was convinced he was innocent but then after reading up about it and what the documentary left out I wasn't so sure

Oh I see. It's the same with WM3 ( the 3 boys I mentioned) to be honest. The first document in 1996 was biased towards their innocence and left out a lot of crucial information. That document is what got them Hollywood support and everyone pushed the innocence. All documentaries and publicity after did the same but when you actually read more you can have doubts like for example one of the boys actually confessed 5 times that they did it but then a lot of what he said was a bit inconsistent with what they found but at the same time there were things only the people that did it could have known.

Another thing that's interesting is that after they were released, the boy that initially confessed cut ties with the other two. People say it could be guilt is eating him up. They deemed him the most unstable/retarded at the time I believe. But the "ring leader" Damian Echols was such a weird boy though, he drank blood at the time maybe still does now.