[Ammi]

...I just don't understand why an 'explanation' as such should ever be necessary or felt that it should be given because in voting for an anti establishment, it should be self explanatory...no justification should be needed because that anti-establishment should represent the anti of everything not so good with government and establishment and Trump just doesn't...so far as corruption is concerned, well he has no history and he has nothing to gage on so that's an unknown but what is a known is his character and how much more negative he brings with him in all of his prejudices, in his lack of integrity, in his I couldn't care less what I say/which world leader I upset, type ways...

..I'm fairly sure he'll win..(and YAY TS because he deserves lovely things with his bet..)..but it's been like a car crash/disaster in slow motion..that helplessness of just watching...


...it's been unfortunate that Hilary has represented the very worst in corruption type establishment, the Clintons are not well liked..(well probably fairly much hated in the USA in terms of politics.....)...so there has been a real focus on exposing with them because Bill wasn't a good 'front man' and Hilary wouldn't be a good front woman either...but I personally do wonder, is government corruption any different no matter who is the front, it's just that an illusion has to be created of someone with integrity in the lead and in the hotseat..this is where the irony comes really because no, no we can't have Hilary she's not a good representative so we'll have Trump instead, I mean what a guy, eh.....it's just the most ridiculous situation in world leadership sags in the whole history of, surely...


...anyways, the Clintons are just seen as the black sheep of political families, the wayward children..the USA likes to be represented by someone who is seen as representing their values..Ronald Reagan, the good old boy and his Nancy or Obama, the great family man and a man with integrity..(my feelings are that there would still have been the same corruptions very virulent during their reign because sadly it's just so deep and a part of any establishment in politics..)..but with them and similar presidents, their 'frontman' countered and hid and smoke-screened etc...it's all about appearances, isn't it...so we'll justify Trump because it's all we have, it's all we're left with...but the problem for me is that the corruption and inherent issues will still be there in the establishment plus he'll bring in extra negatives/prejudices as well..he'll bring them in with him and also bring them out in some public as well and just create new issues...he won't be a saviour because I doubt anyone could be, government corruption is too established and too determined and too in control...


...anyways, for me the 'why I would vote Trump over Hilary' things are just not relevant because people supported Trump before it became just between him and Hilary...which is the worry for me and why anything he represents should not be given validation as being acceptable...