Quote:
Originally Posted by kirklancaster
Is this Dezzy evasive speak for: "Yes I was WRONG Kirk, I DID quote you first and commented, so you are 100% CORRECT"?
And can you PLEASE interpret what it is you are EXACTLY saying below Dezzy because I honestly do not know, so I cannot respond.
"Just because you didn't quote my post doesn't mean that post wasn't aimed at me for saying that a lot of the public are uninformed and don't pay attention to the actual issues."
WHICH post of yours out of the hundreds which I have NOT quoted are you referring to?
Why would I aim any post at you WITHOUT quoting - THAT is not my style.
All that I am TRYING to do on here - as ALWAYS - is debate HONESTLY and FAIRLY and CIVILLY without being drawn into personal arguments.
|
Evasive? not even slightly. Your post that I quoted was obviously referring to the point I made about the uninformed masses then you tried to make out that I called you uninformed even though I didn't because you were looking for a reason to be offended.
Threaded Mode