[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Just because you didn't quote my post doesn't mean that post wasn't aimed at me for saying that a lot of the public are uninformed and don't pay attention to the actual issues.

Is this Dezzy evasive speak for: "Yes I was WRONG Kirk, I DID quote you first and commented, so you are 100% CORRECT"?

And can you PLEASE interpret what it is you are EXACTLY saying below Dezzy because I honestly do not know, so I cannot respond.

"Just because you didn't quote my post doesn't mean that post wasn't aimed at me for saying that a lot of the public are uninformed and don't pay attention to the actual issues."

WHICH post of yours out of the hundreds which I have NOT quoted are you referring to?

Why would I aim any post at you WITHOUT quoting - THAT is not my style.

All that I am TRYING to do on here - as ALWAYS - is debate HONESTLY and FAIRLY and CIVILLY without being drawn into personal arguments.