[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I'm not talking about just this thread, as you well know, but the many others when you and other posters have thrown around the 'racist', 'bigot', etc allegations in an attempt to shut down opposing views, then have the nerve to complain about 'loony left' comments. If you dish it out, then suck it up.

Go find me examples then, if you make claims you have to back them up. I'm waiting.

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Really, a golliwog doll, a child' toy, which has not been around for years, is more offensive than the female subjugation flag ncreasingly being waved around on our streets everyday. Only from a man!

It's not a competition of what's more offensive. what relevance does this 'flag' have to a discussion about a shop that apparently 'celebrates the British way of life?' Very little, I'm guessing unlike the Golliwog.

Originally Posted by Brillopad

What, in one breath you imply the guy is lying, but in the other are keen to find offence regarding a defunct doll, suggesting that bit could be true. Can't have it both ways.

You should perhaps read posts more carefully, also try to read the original article so you understand the story better.

The only 'complaint' listed in the article is a very mild and reasonably presented point. Hardly the 'attacks' the shop owner is making them out to be.

I said that the bit about his shop being trashed was a blatant lie. The article offers proof of people 'complaining' (if you can call the example that). If the Golliwog thing is true then people would have reason to complain. I never doubted that he didn't have 'complaints,' It was the OTT comments he made about people trashing his shop and threatening to protest it that I didn't believe (unlike the example in the article, there's no proof whatsoever of his claims).