[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Northern Monkey

They did save him from the eviction.

I know ,which says to any normal person that the public wanted to keep him,so why then would BB go against the public vote taking their money,it's a tad sneaky,maybe if they had been upfront and said what was happeneing first it would have been different ,the public could have then decided whether to vote or not,but they didn't,it would be the same for anyone who had left like that not just Austin.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

I know ,which says to any normal person that the public wanted to keep him,so why then would BB go against the public vote taking their money,it's a tad sneaky,maybe if they had been upfront and said what was happeneing first it would have been different ,the public could have then decided whether to vote or not,but they didn't,it would be the same for anyone who had left like that not just Austin.

Agree,voters were not even told until last minute that it was going to be a double eviction