[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by the truth

not on national tv in front of billions, if it was said there, thered be a mosntrous backlash

What you never heard men on TV making a women being bad drivers comment? Ever watched Top Gear the jeremy Clarkeson era?

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

What you never heard men on TV making a women being bad drivers comment? Ever watched Top Gear the jeremy Clarkeson era?

When was that said, years ago no doubt...Ive heard infinitely worse said about men and said all the time every day/...we get male hate 24/7 in this country on the tv especially , loose women is a daily dose of misandry and no one dare say a word in protest. andry gray makes a meaningless joke about a lineswoman off air and loses his job and his home
double standards

this comment by rylance is prodoundly sexist totally anti male misandrist, generalizing that all men are inferior to all women in the field of opposing anything? that is generalized stereotyped sexism and if said by a man about a woman he would be kicked off the show.

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by the truth

When was that said, years ago no doubt...Ive heard infinitely worse said about men and said all the time every day/...we get male hate 24/7 in this country on the tv especially , loose women is a daily dose of misandry and no one dare say a word in protest. andry gray makes a meaningless joke about a lineswoman off air and loses his job and his home
double standards

this comment by rylance is prodoundly sexist totally anti male misandrist, generalizing that all men are inferior to all women in the field of opposing anything? that is generalized stereotyped sexism and if said by a man about a woman he would be kicked off the show.

yes poor discriminated against men, especially the straight white ones, so much hardship and struggle they've had to endure

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

yes poor discriminated against men, especially the straight white ones, so much hardship and struggle they've had to endure

Heartless as always. yes I'm sure the fact male suicides are at an all time high, at nearly 5 times the rate of women in western society is a source of great amusement to you. that's before we factor in the billions more spent on womens health and support networks, the 80%+ divorce settlements which take the children and family home and half his lifes income from the estranged broken hearted father. Yes hilarious? Where is your compassion?

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by the truth

Heartless as always. yes I'm sure the fact male suicides are at an all time high, at nearly 5 times the rate of women in western society is a source of great amusement to you. that's before we factor in the billions more spent on womens health and support networks, the 80%+ divorce settlements which take the children and family home and half his lifes income from the estranged broken hearted father. Yes hilarious? Where is your compassion?

I've saved up my compassion for when I speak to someone who's genuinely interested in a discussion and not just pushing their anti woman agenda

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

I've saved up my compassion for when I speak to someone who's genuinely interested in a discussion and not just pushing their anti woman agenda

What a heartless reply. This is Pro men , not anti women, thats the key difference you refuse to acknowledge because you dont care. Ive yet to witness any compassion for men on any thread, even ones Im not involved in. You have shown zero empathy , sympathy or interest in male issues and simply try to derail all threads. Even the threads detailing the 80 million working class men killed in world wars, didnt hear a pip out of you

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by the truth

What a heartless reply. This is Pro men , not anti women, thats the key difference you refuse to acknowledge because you dont care. Ive yet to witness any compassion for men on any thread, even ones Im not involved in. You have shown zero empathy , sympathy or interest in male issues and simply try to derail all threads. Even the threads detailing the 80 million working class men killed in world wars, didnt hear a pip out of you

Calm down truth you sound hysterical.

Now you and I both know that isn't true, i have actually spoken to you about certain mens issues, ones that i have personal experience in especially like fathers Rights. I have no problem accepting if something is sexist against men, infact my first and second posts on this thread actually state that. What I have an issue with is every single time you turn it into a competition and make it us against them which is very unhelpful to- I was going to say your cause but we both know that's not actually what your real cause is, don't we?

Now I've given you enough play time, you're welcome though

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

yes poor discriminated against men, especially the straight white ones, so much hardship and struggle they've had to endure

You made me snort tea ffs. This is becoming a habit

The comment about scientists being religious though...erm...don't science and religion kinda clash in many vital areas? I cannot imagine a scientist being overly religious tbh

This thread is actually quite hilarious. And all because of a throwaway comment some guy made.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

You made me snort tea ffs. This is becoming a habit

The comment about scientists being religious though...erm...don't science and religion kinda clash in many vital areas? I cannot imagine a scientist being overly religious tbh

This thread is actually quite hilarious. And all because of a throwaway comment some guy made.

most scientists over history are religious and they see no conflict. it's called faith. do your homework

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by the truth

most scientists over history are religious and they see no conflict. it's called faith. do your homework

Do yours, you're confusing faith and belief in the possibility of a god with religious observance.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Do yours, you're confusing faith and belief in the possibility of a god with religious observance.

no you are and you haven't done your homework

[user104658]

Originally Posted by the truth

most scientists over history are religious and they see no conflict. it's called faith. do your homework

Fake news.

Historical scientists generally were publicly religious because society was pretty harsh on "Heretics", and also, because academic institutions were often intertwined with religious bodies and they essentially wouldn't have been able to fund their careers if they were openly non-religious or agnostic.

If you're talking about more modern scientists you are also misinformed. Many have expressed a general belief in a creator / spirituality surrounding "the universe" but, again, endlessly, AGAIN, this is not the same thing as following an organised religion. Belief in an "unknown" god is not necessarily illogical. Following a human religious doctrine is.

You might be referring to the very common misconception that Einstein was a Christian. He was not. This generally comes from his "God does not play dice" type comments. Einstein was an agnostic and having just looked it up, he eloquently states my exact thinking on the issue:

Originally Posted by Albert Einstein

The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. May I not reply with a parable? The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe. We are in the position of a little child, entering a huge library whose walls are covered to the ceiling with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written those books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books, a mysterious order, which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of the human mind, even the greatest and most cultured, toward God. We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only dimly. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations.

Ultimate . Human religions seek to explain a concept that is so far beyond human comprehension that we can't even begin to contemplate it, let alone explain it. Human religion is borne of fear of the unknown, and arrogance.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Fake news.

Historical scientists generally were publicly religious because society was pretty harsh on "Heretics", and also, because academic institutions were often intertwined with religious bodies and they essentially wouldn't have been able to fund their careers if they were openly non-religious or agnostic.

If you're talking about more modern scientists you are also misinformed. Many have expressed a general belief in a creator / spirituality surrounding "the universe" but, again, endlessly, AGAIN, this is not the same thing as following an organised religion. Belief in an "unknown" god is not necessarily illogical. Following a human religious doctrine is.

You might be referring to the very common misconception that Einstein was a Christian. He was not. This generally comes from his "God does not play dice" type comments. Einstein was an agnostic and having just looked it up, he eloquently states my exact thinking on the issue:



Ultimate . Human religions seek to explain a concept that is so far beyond human comprehension that we can't even begin to contemplate it, let alone explain it. Human religion is borne of fear of the unknown, and arrogance.

no that's you're form of atheism you're describing