Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad
It concerns a lot of people and rightly so. He has a questionable history and you can deny that all you like, but many are simply not prepared to overlook it. There's too much at stake.
|
They all have questionable histories, let's be frank here. I know it's not "our country" - but you seem VERY prepared to overlook Donald Trump's questionable history both personal and political when it suits? You seem very prepared to overlook Theresa May selling billions of pounds worth of weapons to Saudi that will most likely end up in the hands of terrorists? I'm not saying Corbyn's past is squeaky clean - show me anyone over the age of 40 who DOES have a squeaky clean past and I'll start drawing up the contracts for chocolate teapots - I'm saying he realistically isn't an "ISIS supporter" or a realistic security threat. It's smear-nonsense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bitontheslide
Have to disagree with you there Joey, Corbyn would be considered a security risk from his past behaviour. As much as people would like to pretend that he is an angel spawned from god, his past is there for all to see. History can't be re-written i'm afraid to say.
|
If he "was considered a security threat" he wouldn't be in his position. It's as simple as that. Unless you believe the authorities to be incompetent to sitcom-levels.
Threaded Mode