[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

Why because it is critical of 'king' Corbyn? The attempt to control what news subjects can be posted on here is what is more off-putting.

Because, if you acknowledged TS' post instead of ignoring it because you can't argue against it, then you would have to accept that the article tried to make out that only Labour Supported Remain when the issue of Brexit divided ALL the parties. From the very first sentence it had a critical inaccuracy that informed the rest of the article, thus voiding it of validity.

Again, you keep trying to attack people by making out they worship Corbyn but you are the only one that talks about him anymore. You are the one making topics about him, you are the one bringing him up in unrelated topics. You are obsessed with him and no one else is. You are confusing your imagination in which everyone worships Corbyn to the reality in which you are the only one talking about him and that's quite worrying.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Because, if you acknowledged TS' post instead of ignoring it because you can't argue against it, then you would have to accept that the article tried to make out that only Labour Supported Remain when the issue of Brexit divided ALL the parties. From the very first sentence it had a critical inaccuracy that informed the rest of the article, thus voiding it of validity.

Again, you keep trying to attack people by making out they worship Corbyn but you are the only one that talks about him anymore. You are the one making topics about him, you are the one bringing him up in unrelated topics. You are obsessed with him and no one else is. You are confusing your imagination in which everyone worships Corbyn to the reality in which you are the only one talking about him and that's quite worrying.

Have you checked the date of the article - it is current news, you know something on our TVs and in our newspapers daily. Our country is experiencing uncertain times and many are interested in current events that affect all our lives even if you aren't. That isn't attacking people - it is presenting a different opinion. You are the one obsessed, obsessed with the word obsessed - as you have accused me of being obsessed about several different things. This is Serious Debates is it not, or are we only supposed to be interested in sex dolls and sausage rolls!

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

You seem to find a lot quite worrying as it seems to have become a mantra of yours. I could reccommend Kalms from your local health shop - they are helpful to those that suffer from anxiety.

Have you checked the date of the article - it is current news, you know something on our TVs and in our newspapers daily. Our country is experiencing uncertain times and many are interested in current events that affect all our lives even if you aren't. This is Serious Debates is it not, or are we only supposed to be interested in sex dolls and sausage rolls!

Then why are you focusing on the leader of the opposition? The person who is maintaining the status quo for some while subjecting others to a life of poverty and degradation is the current govt... Where are the voxpops in relation to that?

Discussing Corbyn at the moment is tantamount to discussion on sausage rolls as he is no the one in power making all the decisions is he?...

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Then why are you focusing on the leader of the opposition? The person who is maintaining the status quo for some while subjecting others to a life of poverty and degradation is the current govt... Where are the voxpops in relation to that?

Discussing Corbyn at the moment is tantamount to discussion on sausage rolls as he is no the one in power making all the decisions is he?...

No, much to his distain, and he is trying very to be. His views are not 'maintaining the status quo' in the eyes of many, of which I am clearly one, and therefore his behaviour is of interest to me.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

No, much to his distain, and he is trying very to be. His views are not 'maintaining the status quo' in the eyes of many, of which I am clearly one, and therefore his behaviour is of interest to me.

Good! What has the 'status quo' done?... The country is on it's arse! Austerity as an economic model has never worked it has been used many times before.

There has to be a point where you say, is there not a better way? Even if it was the conservatives saying it I would listen.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

You seem to find a lot quite worrying as it seems to have become a mantra of yours. I could reccommend Kalms from your local health shop - they are helpful to those that suffer from anxiety.

Have you checked the date of the article - it is current news, you know something on our TVs and in our newspapers daily. Our country is experiencing uncertain times and many are interested in current events that affect all our lives even if you aren't. That isn't attacking people - it is presenting a different opinion. You are the one obsessed, obsessed with the word obsessed - as you have accused me of being obsessed about several different things. This is Serious Debates is it not, or are we only supposed to be interested in sex dolls and sausage rolls!

So you've chosen to ignore the grave revisionist inaccuracy in the article because an inaccuracy supports your agenda more than the actual reality of what happened. Says it all really.